[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 147529] MsgBox(missingArg) incorrectly succeeds
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147529 Andreas Heinisch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |andreas.heini...@yahoo.de |desktop.org | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 147529] MsgBox(missingArg) incorrectly succeeds
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147529 Andreas Heinisch changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 ||8466 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 147529] MsgBox(missingArg) incorrectly succeeds
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147529 --- Comment #5 from Andreas Heinisch --- Atm, I don't know such a generic place. So we should tackle one function at a time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 147529] MsgBox(missingArg) incorrectly succeeds
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147529 --- Comment #4 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #3) Oh, ignore me. It is not the case when we pass an argument to another user-defined function. I am not sure is we can find some generic place to handle missing optionals in run-time library functions. Do you have a proposal in mind? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 147529] MsgBox(missingArg) incorrectly succeeds
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147529 --- Comment #3 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to Andreas Heinisch from comment #2) I suppose that we could break when a missing optional is passed as an argument which is not marked optional? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 147529] MsgBox(missingArg) incorrectly succeeds
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147529 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Heinisch --- Should we fix this directly in the corresponding function (SbRtl_MsgBox) while the different parameters will be retrieved or could we set it somewhere in the retrieval process? I doubt that MsgBox is the only function which should throw an error with a missing optional paramter. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 147529] MsgBox(missingArg) incorrectly succeeds
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147529 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 147529] MsgBox(missingArg) incorrectly succeeds
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147529 raal changed: What|Removed |Added CC||r...@post.cz Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from raal --- repro Version: 7.4.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community Build ID: c97a3592c78ce276a353f95ce68c70a8a39174a0 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.13; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: cs-CZ (cs_CZ.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded Jumbo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 147529] MsgBox(missingArg) incorrectly succeeds
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147529 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
