[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 152108] spell-checking of mixed-language phrases
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152108 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- Thank you, Ulrich and Stuart. I am marking this as a duplicate, we can continue the conversation there (I've already added a comment). *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 131487 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 152108] spell-checking of mixed-language phrases
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152108 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 152108] spell-checking of mixed-language phrases
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152108 --- Comment #4 from QA Administrators --- [Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 152108] spell-checking of mixed-language phrases
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152108 Ulrich Windl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ulrich.wi...@rz.uni-regensb ||urg.de --- Comment #3 from Ulrich Windl --- (In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #1) > A similar report is Bug 131487. Indeed; to me it seems that any marking for specific language should override the built-in word-boundaries. So for the example (using pseudo-language)"Firewall-Regeln" there should be two components: "Firewall" Using english language rules) and "-Regeln" (using default (German) language rules); maybe the leading minus in "-Regeln" actually causes the problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 152108] spell-checking of mixed-language phrases
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152108 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nem...@numbertext.org, ||vsfo...@libreoffice.org --- Comment #2 from V Stuart Foote --- To my mind => NAB. Perhaps László should comment on how the spell-checking is structured. And what if anything additional could be achieved for crafting the dictionaries. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 152108] spell-checking of mixed-language phrases
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152108 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 ||1487 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 152108] spell-checking of mixed-language phrases
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152108 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||101912, 96000 CC||stephane.guillou@libreoffic ||e.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO --- Comment #1 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) --- It is true it is surprising that the spellchecker takes the hyphenated string as a whole, using the English dictionary for the whole thing, when in fact it there are two different languages used for the different elements. Reproduced with: Version: 7.4.2.3 / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 382eef1f22670f7f4118c8c2dd222ec7ad009daf CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: de-DE (en_AU.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded A similar report is Bug 131487. Could you please see if that covers your usecase and if your voice should rather be added there? Thank you! Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96000 [Bug 96000] [META] Spelling and grammar checking bugs and enhancements https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101912 [Bug 101912] [META] Accessibility (a11y) bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
