[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 152396] Variable font: variants are not correctly selected

2022-12-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152396

--- Comment #4 from خالد حسني  ---
I tried to debug this and now I’m very skeptical that font width ever worked,
it seems to be ignored left and right.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 152396] Variable font: variants are not correctly selected

2022-12-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152396

خالد حسني  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

--- Comment #3 from خالد حسني  ---
It does not seem to be a variable font issue, rather it seems that LibreOffice
is failing to use the width variants at all, i.e. the width is always ignored.
If you install the static fonts you get the same issue.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 152396] Variable font: variants are not correctly selected

2022-12-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152396

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||103378, 102985


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102985
[Bug 102985] [META] Font bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103378
[Bug 103378] [META] PDF export bugs and enhancements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 152396] Variable font: variants are not correctly selected

2022-12-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152396

V Stuart Foote  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10
   ||8497
 CC||kha...@aliftype.com,
   ||vsfo...@libreoffice.org

--- Comment #2 from V Stuart Foote  ---
I'm sure خالد will comment, but I think 
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/142028 was an incremental handling of
variable fonts until (or even if) more work on HB based instantiation in PDF
provides better glyph stamping. 

The mangled PS font names are there in the PDF, but I don't think we can expect
the bitmap glyps to match appearance on VCL canvas yet.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 152396] Variable font: variants are not correctly selected

2022-12-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152396

--- Comment #1 from RGB  ---
Created attachment 184021
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=184021=edit
PDF output of a sample documnet using both, the variable and the standard
version of Junicode Two Beta

In the attached PDF you can see the behavior described in the report. The first
three lines show the static versions of Junicode Two Beta in its Condensed,
Regular and SemiExpanded variants. The following line show the variable version
which LibreOffice label as condensed, independently of which style you select
from those indicated between parenthesis. As you can see, the "condensed" from
the variable font matches with the SemiExpanded static variant, not with the
condensed. 

The embedded variable font don't show its name in the exported PDF.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.