https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32420
--- Comment #7 from Regis Perdreau ---
up diagonal strike still missing in 6.3 master...
May be something we can derivate from overstrike.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32420
--- Comment #6 from Regis Perdreau ---
I understand that is it requested a feature to add easily a strike over a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32420
Thomas Lendo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||39750
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32420
--- Comment #5 from QA Administrators qa-ad...@libreoffice.org ---
Please read this message in its entirety before responding.
Your bug was confirmed at least 1 year ago and has not had any activity on it
for over a year. Your bug is still set
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32420
--- Comment #4 from Frédéric Wang fred.w...@free.fr ---
(In reply to comment #3)
So, the neg ? solves your problem?
neg is to take the negation of a Boolean expression. In LaTeX \not strikes
its argument. For example \not \in will produce the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32420
--- Comment #3 from Marcos Souza marcos.souza@gmail.com ---
So, the neg ? solves your problem?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32420
Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32420
RGB r...@email.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #2 from RGB