https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
--- Comment #22 from b. ---
(In reply to Jean-Baptiste Faure from comment #21)
it's a little overstretching the OT, but as you ask and since many similar
questions are worrying me ...
> Why did you implement mathematical
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
Eike Rathke changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
Jean-Baptiste Faure changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbfa...@libreoffice.org
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
Christopher M. Penalver changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|newbie...@gmx.de|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
b. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|=(-8)^(1/3) should return |=(-8)^(1/3) should return
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
Christopher M. Penalver changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||newbie...@gmx.de
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
--- Comment #17 from Christopher M. Penalver
---
(In reply to b. from comment #16)
> here is still some air upward, while '=(-8)^(1/3)^(2)' results in 4, just
> like '=(-8)^(2)^(1/3)', '=(-8)^(2/3)' produces #NUM! error, at least in ver.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
--- Comment #16 from b. ---
here is still some air upward, while '=(-8)^(1/3)^(2)' results in 4, just like
'=(-8)^(2)^(1/3)', '=(-8)^(2/3)' produces #NUM! error, at least in ver.
Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+ (x64)
Build ID:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
--- Comment #15 from Commit Notification
---
Xisco Fauli committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/f07a56498875e67fa2637fd0a73890629024efa8
tdf#44076: sc: Add
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:6.3.0|target:6.3.0 target:7.1.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
--- Comment #14 from Commit Notification
---
Eike Rathke committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/f4844297c9cdbbf341e3e7d5e2e0c0c18cb40553%5E%21
Related: tdf#44076 use
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||target:6.3.0
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
--- Comment #13 from Commit Notification
---
Eike Rathke committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/559758a35216c0cb852de65d129154947a4d91e8%5E%21
Related: tdf#44076 do
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
Christopher M. Penalver changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
--- Comment #11 from mwelin...@gmail.com ---
No accuracy problem either. You can enter 6004799503160661 in A1 and widen
the column enough that you can see the whole, odd number. You can then add or
subtract 1 and see ...662 and ...660 as
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
Eike Rathke changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
--- Comment #9 from mwelin...@gmail.com ---
If you have (-8)^(1/3) --> -2
then you also have (-8)^(6004799503160661/2^54) --> -2
And that's clearly wrong.
Note: there are no rounding errors in evaluating 6004799503160661/2^54.
--
You
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
--- Comment #8 from Xavier Van Wijmeersch ---
tested with
Version: 6.1.4.0.0+
Build ID: 17c87566e84ac433645f264a9bee4cb5ddbd23a5
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 4.19; UI render: default; VCL: kde4;
Locale: nl-BE (en_US.UTF-8); Calc: group
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mwelin...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
Eike Rathke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||esc...@gmail.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
Eike Rathke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|3.3.3 release |Inherited From
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
Markus Mohrhard markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
Christopher M. Penalver christopher.penal...@gmx.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Platform|Other
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
Regina Henschel rb.hensc...@t-online.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
--- Comment #2 from markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com 2011-12-23 03:36:05 PST ---
Hm after an additional thought I'm not sure if it is really that simple to
implement. At the point where we calculate the power we no longer have the
information that
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44076
markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment
29 matches
Mail list logo