https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #30 from b. ---
@Matt K: 'to see why this is happening' - roundup/roundoff error of factors /
divisors used for rounding strike?, while all (sorry, most) '1E+x' values are
exact as being integers most '1E-x' values carry
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
Matt K changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #28 from Matt K
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
b. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
Severity|enhancement
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
Matt K changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #26 from Matt K
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #25 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to b. from comment #24)
> whatever it is - you'll know better than me - it's a valid starting point
> for the proposed algorithm,
No. What is fine at the time of saving, is not OK at the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #24 from b. ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #22)
thanks for your fast reply,
> I doubt that this is "info about the significant decimals keyed in by the
> user". Rather, it's the number rounded to some number of
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #23 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to b. from comment #21)
> to calm down: ex$el is only slightly better in these things, in this test it
> has only one error in the first 62 lines instead of three (calc), and the
> first
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #22 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to b. from comment #21)
> thanks for your comment, sorry for objecting, please correct me if i'm
> wrong,
Please don't. There's no need to be sorry for any objecting.
> from a file saved
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #21 from b. ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #20)
> (In reply to b. from comment #19)
> > or are values stored as floats there too?
>
> This. Calc is not a key logger.
hello @Mike Kaganski,
thanks for your
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #20 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to b. from comment #19)
> or are values stored as floats there too?
This. Calc is not a key logger.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #19 from b. ---
one more suggestion ... inspired from:
> 0.05*39=1.9502
> -2+0.05*39=-0.049822
the first calculation is 'two decimals' times 'integer' ...
users would expect, and mathematical
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #18 from b. ---
just an idea ...
intelligent rounding may lead to intelligent faults?
the user expects a value / number fitting his input and his idea what to
calculate,
A) would it work to round to the number of digits
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
Eike Rathke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||difficultyInteresting,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #16 from Mike Kaganski ---
In double precision,
> 0.05*39=1.9502
> -2+0.05*39=-0.049822
First idea is that if we returned not only the increment from the approxDiff,
but also the number of decimals
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #15 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Eike Rathke from comment #14)
> In the Input Line.
Ah yes, sorry. Blind me; must had missed that because of being tired in the
evening :-)
I don't think we need to limit the precision
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #14 from Eike Rathke ---
In the Input Line.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #13 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Eike Rathke from comment #12)
> and in fact in current master this bug here is not exactly reproducible
> anymore, but the imprecision instead starts at -0.1 with -0.0999
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
Eike Rathke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikekagan...@hotmail.com
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #11 from b. ---
there have also been improvements made by @Eike Rathke in bug #90419, could
something from that help for this bug?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--- Comment #10 from Buovjaga
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
b. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||newbie...@gmx.de
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
raal changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #7 from Xavier Van Wijmeersch ---
Can not reproduce the error with, tested with both examples.
Version: 6.0.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: 41b7713334351d7cc455eef5241bd3988b9d1e94
CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 4.9; UI
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
Thomas Lendo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||107575
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
Eike Rathke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||er...@redhat.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #6 from sharkylaser <2xd9yw+i0g75dzsv...@sharklasers.com> ---
Confirmed in 5.0.4.2
Attachment added.
Possible floating point error.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #5 from sharkylaser <2xd9yw+i0g75dzsv...@sharklasers.com> ---
Created attachment 122375
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=122375=edit
Floating point error when dragging a list to auto fill
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
Beluga todven...@suomi24.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||todven...@suomi24.fi
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #3 from QA Administrators qa-ad...@libreoffice.org ---
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
--- Comment #2 from Owen Genat owen.ge...@gmail.com ---
Still reproducible (both in example and for new sheets) under Ubuntu 10.04
x86_64 running v4.1.3.2 Build ID: 70feb7d99726f064edab4605a8ab840c50ec57a.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #68541|text/plain
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55960
billh...@y7mail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
33 matches
Mail list logo