[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 62279] : Autosum (Sigma) Function ignoring existing sum cells

2017-06-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62279 Eike Rathke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- You

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 62279] : Autosum (Sigma) Function ignoring existing sum cells

2017-06-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62279 Eike Rathke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 62279] : Autosum (Sigma) Function ignoring existing sum cells

2017-01-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62279 --- Comment #16 from Thomas Krumbein --- still present in Version 5.3.0.1 (x64) Januar 2017 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 62279] : Autosum (Sigma) Function ignoring existing sum cells

2016-07-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62279 --- Comment #15 from Xzorg6 --- This bug is still present in LibreOffice 5.1.4.2 (July 2016) on any OS. With the same behavior reported in 2013. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 62279] : Autosum (Sigma) Function ignoring existing sum cells

2015-12-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62279 --- Comment #14 from Colin --- Still there in 4.4.6.3 Win 10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. ___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 62279] : Autosum (Sigma) Function ignoring existing sum cells

2015-12-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62279 --- Comment #13 from QA Administrators --- ** Please read this message in its entirety before responding ** To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 62279] : Autosum (Sigma) Function ignoring existing sum cells

2014-11-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62279 --- Comment #12 from kevin.wis...@gmail.com --- I am seeing this same problem with LO Mac 4.3.1.2 and whatever is current in Manjaro Linux. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 62279] : Autosum (Sigma) Function ignoring existing sum cells

2013-10-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62279 Owen Genat owen.ge...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Hardware|Other |All

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 62279] : Autosum (Sigma) Function ignoring existing sum cells

2013-10-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62279 --- Comment #11 from Owen Genat owen.ge...@gmail.com --- [...] this rather awful bug [...] I would like to clarify my prior comment in the context of what is stated in comment #1, that the AutoSum (Σ) toolbar button detects intermediate

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 62279] : Autosum (Sigma) Function ignoring existing sum cells

2013-03-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62279 Jacques Guilleron guillero...@aol.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 62279] : Autosum (Sigma) Function ignoring existing sum cells

2013-03-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62279 Colin that.man.co...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #76458|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 62279] : Autosum (Sigma) Function ignoring existing sum cells

2013-03-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62279 --- Comment #8 from Colin that.man.co...@gmail.com --- Hi there again, Jacques, Sorry if this is becoming verbose, I have now had the opportunity to perform a more systematic test. It is questionable as to whether it is a genuine bug or a simple

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 62279] : Autosum (Sigma) Function ignoring existing sum cells

2013-03-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62279 --- Comment #3 from Jacques Guilleron guillero...@aol.com --- Hello Colin, Thank you for precisions. My results: For range B11:B17, Sigma function give 573 in B19. For range B11:B18, Sigma function give 635 in B20. These results on LO 4.0.2.0+,

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 62279] : Autosum (Sigma) Function ignoring existing sum cells

2013-03-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62279 --- Comment #4 from Colin that.man.co...@gmail.com --- Hi Again. Jacques, I'm running Vista (SP2) and all relevant updates. If we continue to achieve different results should I download one of the LO versions you have already verified in your W7

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 62279] : Autosum (Sigma) Function ignoring existing sum cells

2013-03-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62279 --- Comment #5 from Jacques Guilleron guillero...@aol.com --- Hi Colin, The easiest way to do that is to download a LO 4.0.2.x daily build. This is a dev release. It install a second paralell release on your computer and don't touch your

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 62279] : Autosum (Sigma) Function ignoring existing sum cells

2013-03-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62279 --- Comment #1 from Jacques Guilleron guillero...@aol.com --- Hello Colin, In your small spreadsheet, cursor in cell B18, if I select Sigma function, proposal is to add B13:B17 because it detects intermediate calculus. But selecting B11:B17 get

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 62279] : Autosum (Sigma) Function ignoring existing sum cells

2013-03-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62279 Jacques Guilleron guillero...@aol.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 62279] : Autosum (Sigma) Function ignoring existing sum cells

2013-03-14 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62279 Colin that.man.co...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED