https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
--- Comment #22 from Bernard Moreton ---
If LO exported in PDF/A-2 or above, transparancies would be ok ...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
--- Comment #21 from tommy27 ---
@Andreas Mantke
could you please give a look at this one?
this is an already bibisected regression (see comment 17)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
--- Comment #20 from Jim Avera ---
Problem is still there in 5.1.0.0.alpha1+
The message says "A transparent object was painted opaque instead" which can
not be true (because the document only contains ordinary black
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
--- Comment #19 from Evil Overlord ---
No progress on this? It seems to have been an issue for years now. Not knowing
the below, I've just spent half an hour futilely trying to track down a hidden
png or other
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
Beluga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
Matthew Francis fdb...@neosheffield.co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||bisected
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
Matthew Francis fdb...@neosheffield.co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
--- Comment #16 from Matthew Francis fdb...@neosheffield.co.uk ---
Within the above range, this commit looks potentially related:
commit f8f96e9da066047d65dad0f4d296171ecef73d43
Author: Andreas Mantke a...@lappiandreas.site
Date: Sun Apr 15
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
Beluga todven...@suomi24.fi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||todven...@suomi24.fi
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
--- Comment #14 from Owen Genat owen.ge...@gmail.com ---
Bug #59271 is certainly related although it appears to be an enhancement
request to add a new facility for a variety of warning messages. This bug is a
regression of prior behaviour and is
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
--- Comment #13 from ign_christian ign_christ...@yahoo.com ---
Perhaps same as Bug 59271 ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
--- Comment #12 from tommy27 ba...@quipo.it ---
(In reply to comment #11)
snip ...
My personal preference would be for the warning to be contextual i.e., if
transparency is detected then display the message, otherwise avoid
displaying
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
tommy27 ba...@quipo.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||phclemen...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
tommy27 ba...@quipo.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freedesktop.or
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
tommy27 ba...@quipo.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Linux (All) |All
Summary|Export
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
--- Comment #11 from Owen Genat owen.ge...@gmail.com ---
we should discover if that is an intended warning that must pop up at any print
as I said, is that warning a bug or an intended alert message that has to be
showed anyway?
It would seem
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
--- Comment #8 from tommy27 ba...@quipo.it ---
good job Owen, this will help the devs to identify why did this change from 3.5
to 3.6.
but as I said, is that warning a bug or an intended alert message that has to
be showed anyway? I don't have
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
James spa...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freedesktop.or
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
--- Comment #2 from James spa...@gmx.net ---
I tried to reproduce this with Ubuntu 13.04 and LO 4.1.0.3 but was unable to do
so.
Owen: Could you please retry with that version if this bug is still valid?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
--- Comment #3 from Domingo Sacristan domingosacris...@gmail.com ---
I can reproduce this with Ubuntu 10.04 and LO 4.0.2 and winXp LO 4.1.0.2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
--- Comment #4 from tommy27 ba...@quipo.it ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Step 5: I use the pdf export from within LO. What do you mean by export to
PDF/A-1a?
do not use the direct pdf export button in the toolbar.
use instead File/Export in
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
Owen Genat owen.ge...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
--- Comment #6 from tommy27 ba...@quipo.it ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Problem description:
No combination of settings under Tools Options... LibreOffice Print
will prevent a warning message about transparency from appearing when
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
Owen Genat owen.ge...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.0.3.3 release |3.6.0.4 release
---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
tommy27 ba...@quipo.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.freedesktop.or
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
tommy27 ba...@quipo.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|: Export to PDF/A-1a gives |Export to PDF/A-1a gives
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65439
--- Comment #1 from Owen Genat owen.ge...@gmail.com ---
Related AskLO question:
http://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/15813/why-do-i-always-get-transparency-error-when-i/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
29 matches
Mail list logo