https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65980
Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65980
--- Comment #27 from Jan Kratochvíl ---
I can confirm, that opening large XLS XML files works. The speed is comparable
to MS Excel. I thing this bug can be closed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65980
--- Comment #26 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #25)
Sorry - the file in question is not the Excel 2003 XML. Sorry for the noise.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65980
--- Comment #25 from Mike Kaganski ---
Well - the Excel 2003 XML format is now read by a new filter based on orcus [1]
[2]; which is why the bugdoc is opened much faster, and no wrong messages would
happen.
But the title of the bug
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65980
Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65980
--- Comment #23 from QA Administrators ---
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65980
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65980
Maxim Monastirsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65980
Maxim Monastirsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65980
Maxim Monastirsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65980
Peter Jentsch pj...@guineapics.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65980
--- Comment #16 from Maxim Monastirsky momonas...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #15)
OK, I get the point, but in that case, why it takes 5 minutes to open 10Mb
file? (5x times click retry)
XSLT processing is slow, it's not related to LO.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65980
--- Comment #17 from Jan Kratochvíl kratoch...@triola.cz ---
OK, I get the point again. So the solution is not to use XML, but other format.
Thanks for clearing that out.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65980
--- Comment #18 from Michael Wood esiot...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Comment # 16
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65980#c16)
XSLT processing is slow, it's not related to LO. Try it yourself from the
terminal:
Yes, XSLT
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65980
--- Comment #19 from Maxim Monastirsky momonas...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Yes, XSLT processing might be slow. I'm not sure that is a sufficient
answer.
This is a sufficient answer, because we don't have a real filter for those
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65980
--- Comment #15 from Jan Kratochvíl kratoch...@triola.cz ---
OK, I get the point, but in that case, why it takes 5 minutes to open 10Mb
file? (5x times click retry)
Should I write bug on that?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65980
Maxim Monastirsky momonas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|High CPU usage and |Wrong message
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65980
Kevin Suo suokunl...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|x86-64 (AMD64) |All
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65980
Maxim Monastirsky momonas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|FILEOPEN: XML MS Word 2003 |Wrong message
19 matches
Mail list logo