[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 77050] Formatting of heading lost if inserted as cross-reference field

2014-07-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77050

Kumāra kumaras...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |enhancement
 CC||kumaras...@gmail.com

--- Comment #4 from Kumāra kumaras...@gmail.com ---
This is not a bug, but an enhancement request. So, I've change the Importance
field accordingly.

I'm one who prefer it as it is (i.e., opposite behaviour of the request).
Besides, I think formatting is not meant to be reproduced for cross-references.
Isn't it odd if you cross-reference a heading that is bold and 24pt large and
in your text that is regular and 12pt?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 77050] Formatting of heading lost if inserted as cross-reference field

2014-07-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77050

--- Comment #5 from s-varoxamox...@vf.uni-konstanz.de ---
Ah, I should elaborate: taking over all formatting would indeed be not useful.
However, in particular italic is very relevant in natural sciences.

Let's reduce this enhancement request to italics only.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 77050] Formatting of heading lost if inserted as cross-reference field

2014-04-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77050

--- Comment #2 from Dominique Boutry dominique.bout...@laposte.net ---
Hi. I understand what you want, but a wonder whether other people may prefer
the opposite (current) behavior.

Despite the fact that I'm not found of this solution, I suppose that it would
be great here to allow both behavior.

Kept to UNCONFIRMED to get additionnal advices.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 77050] Formatting of heading lost if inserted as cross-reference field

2014-04-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77050

--- Comment #3 from s-varoxamox...@vf.uni-konstanz.de ---
On 2014-04-08 11:08, bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org wrote:
 [...] other people may prefer the opposite (current) behavior.

I can't imagine any, but if there are other use-cases in which one would
want to lose formatting: All the more reason to have an option there,
instead of one or the other as default.

Therefore, +1 for a keep formatting-check-box in the Insert | Fields
| Cross-references-dialogue

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 77050] Formatting of heading lost if inserted as cross-reference field

2014-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77050

s-varoxamox...@vf.uni-konstanz.de changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.freedesktop.or
   ||g/show_bug.cgi?id=54314
Version|4.2.0.4 release |4.2.2.1 release

--- Comment #1 from s-varoxamox...@vf.uni-konstanz.de ---
occurs also in v4.2.2.1
initially reported for v4.2.0.2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs