https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:5.3.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #62 from Commit Notification
---
Gabor Kelemen committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "libreoffice-6-0":
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:5.3.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #61 from Commit Notification
---
Gabor Kelemen committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #60 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Commit Notification from comment #59)
> Gabor Kelemen committed a patch related to this issue.
>...
This patch moves the percentage from the beginning of the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #59 from Commit Notification
---
Gabor Kelemen committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:5.3.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #58 from Commit Notification
---
V Stuart Foote committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "libreoffice-5-3":
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:5.3.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:5.3.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #57 from Commit Notification
---
V Stuart Foote committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #56 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #55)
> Actually looked around for how palette folks refer to "Out of gamut"
> warnings.
Then we should write it out. Worst case is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #55 from V Stuart Foote ---
Actually looked around for how palette folks refer to "Out of gamut" warnings.
Some hyphenated, some italicized but no standard and technically here we are
not saturated in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #54 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #53)
> renamed to tonal.soc and adjusted abbreviations
> https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/31136/
OoGamut? Wouldn't 'saturated' be
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #53 from V Stuart Foote ---
renamed to tonal.soc and adjusted abbreviations
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/31136/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #51 from Tomaz Vajngerl ---
Ah, OK - I understand now. Would be nice if we wouldn't need placeholders but
yeah.. that's not possible ATM.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #50 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Tomaz Vajngerl from comment #48)
> Some values are strange or duplicated - I would remove them
>
Tomaž, please review attachment 101316 -- what I've done here
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #49 from Tomaz Vajngerl ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #47)
> (In reply to Commit Notification from comment #46)
> > vsfoote committed a patch related to this issue.
>
> When is it necessary to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #48 from Tomaz Vajngerl ---
Some values are strange or duplicated - I would remove them
100% Grey - #FF
or in other words "pure" black
other examples:
82% Blue saturated - #FE
82% Az saturated
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #47 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Commit Notification from comment #46)
> vsfoote committed a patch related to this issue.
When is it necessary to change Package_palettes.mk? Haven't done it for
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #46 from Commit Notification
---
vsfoote committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #45 from Commit Notification
---
V Stuart Foote committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #44 from V Stuart Foote ---
The column based color chart based on Wade's original ODG, attachment 101316,
is up for review...
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/31061/
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #43 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #42)
> Created attachment 128930 [details]
> tonal_col
>
> (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #41)
> >
> > But completely
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #42 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 128930
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=128930=edit
tonal_col
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #41)
>
> But completely
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #41 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #40)
> Putting whitespace in the top rows makes reduces the usable space. Inverting
> the palette and starting with dark colors at top
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #40 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #38)
> No, the whitespace here is actually appropriate for the blank swatches...
Putting whitespace in the top rows makes reduces the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #39 from V Stuart Foote ---
Created attachment 128928
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=128928=edit
Wade's original color table normalized by graytone
With a 12 column layout
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #38 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #37)
> ...
> Looks very similar to me, both are really nice. If we go with the column
> variant I suggest to invert and start with dark
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #37 from Heiko Tietze ---
Created attachment 128927
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=128927=edit
tonal_row
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #35)
> I think this is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #36 from V Stuart Foote ---
Created attachment 128926
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=128926=edit
clip of suggested tonal_column.soc in the Swatch picker
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #35 from V Stuart Foote ---
Created attachment 128925
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=128925=edit
layout in columns for better UX in swatch picker
@Wade, Owen, *
Here is a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #34 from Commit Notification
---
Owen Genat committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #33 from Francisco ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #32)
Hi all,
> So my suggestion is:
> * remove cmyk, gallery, html, palette, web
> * add this "tonal" palette here, when the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #32 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #30)
> Maybe an idea to ping people that worked on the various previous changes?
Pinged Christoph and KJ. Not sure who else (Astron
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
Regina Henschel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@nouenoff.nl
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
Björn Michaelsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|difficultyBeginner,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
Jan Holesovsky changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ux-advise |LibreOffice
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #22 from Wade D. Peterson wadep_silic...@yahoo.com ---
(In reply to comment #19)
3) An example is the EG 1:1990 “Alignment Color Bar Test Signal for
Television Picture Monitors”. [...] Find “EG 1:1990” in the list; you should
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #23 from Wade D. Peterson wadep_silic...@yahoo.com ---
(In reply to comment #21)
Created attachment 105129 [details]
Screenshot of color picker using row-based SOC.
Relates to attachment 105128 [details].
Greytone organized from
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #24 from Owen Genat owen.ge...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #19)
A patent is a much more significant issue than
copyright, although I sincerely doubt a palette in different arrangement
... would be affected. I forgot to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #13 from Owen Genat owen.ge...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #12)
Could you create a .soc palette with 10 columns ...
The colour picker was changed in v4.2 (bug 67653) to use 12 columns (to bring
it in-line with AOO) and under
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #15 from Owen Genat owen.ge...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 105105
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=105105action=edit
SOC example, using fillers for missing values
(In reply to comment #13)
The colour picker
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #16 from Owen Genat owen.ge...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 105106
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=105106action=edit
Screenshot of color picker using the provided SOC.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #17 from Wade D. Peterson wadep_silic...@yahoo.com ---
@ Owen Genat screenshot of color picker
(In reply to comment #16)
Created attachment 105106 [details]
Screenshot of color picker using the provided SOC.
I think you're close.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #18 from Wade D. Peterson wadep_silic...@yahoo.com ---
Date: 22 AUG 2014
From: Wade D. Peterson, Silicore Corportion
To: File
Subj: Comparative analysis using television color bars
Subject: comparative analysis between television
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #19 from Owen Genat owen.ge...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #17)
I think you're close. It would work better if the grey scale tones between
BLACK (0% grey) and WHITE (100% grey) were aligned with the color grey scale
values.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #20 from Owen Genat owen.ge...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 105128
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=105128action=edit
SOC palette using rows instead of columns.
Here is a reorganised version of the previous SOC
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #21 from Owen Genat owen.ge...@gmail.com ---
Created attachment 105129
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=105129action=edit
Screenshot of color picker using row-based SOC.
Relates to attachment 105128.
--
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #12 from Fabian Alexander Wilms f.alexander.wi...@gmail.com ---
Could you create a .soc palette with 10 columns (see color picker design:
https://redmine.documentfoundation.org/attachments/download/138/color-picker.png)
based on your
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #11 from Owen Genat owen.ge...@gmail.com ---
Regardless of whether this proposal becomes the default palette I do feel it
would be good to have this tonal / standardised palette available. The
percentage naming (rather than subjective
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #9 from Wade D. Peterson wadep_silic...@yahoo.com ---
Created attachment 104623
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=104623action=edit
Spreadsheet for generating color vectors of a specified greytone
A LibreOffice Calc
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #10 from Wade D. Peterson wadep_silic...@yahoo.com ---
Talking points about a color palette organized according to gray scale (a.k.a.
gray tone, or luminance contrast):
1) In the human visual system, color recognition is secondary to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #3 from Mirek2 maz...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #2)
Perhaps same request as Bug 42159 or Bug 37480. Or hex color picker: Bug
44366
No, it's not the same request. This bug is regarding the default color palette.
--
You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #4 from Mirek2 maz...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #0)
Created attachment 101316 [details]
LibreOffice '.odg' file showing recommended color palette
The current color palette used by LibreOffice is not reproducible across a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #5 from Wade D. Peterson wadep_silic...@yahoo.com ---
Created attachment 104569
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=104569action=edit
Version compatibility problems with color palette on OpenOffice
The OpenOffice
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #6 from Wade D. Peterson wadep_silic...@yahoo.com ---
Created attachment 104570
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=104570action=edit
Standard color palette that I've adopted for my documents
This is the standard
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #7 from Wade D. Peterson wadep_silic...@yahoo.com ---
Created attachment 104571
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=104571action=edit
A document example showing how I use colors
This is a document in '.pdf' format
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #8 from Wade D. Peterson wadep_silic...@yahoo.com ---
@ Mirek2 example document
The color palette I proposed is intended to solve device compatibility and
software longevity issues. It's an objective compromise to a solve a problem
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #2 from ign_christian ign_christ...@yahoo.com ---
Perhaps same request as Bug 42159 or Bug 37480. Or hex color picker: Bug 44366
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
Adolfo Jayme f...@libreoffice.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
tommy27 ba...@quipo.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Severity|normal
69 matches
Mail list logo