https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
Sierk Bornemann changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
--- Comment #79 from Martin Srebotnjak ---
@ Emir Sarı (away)
I disagree, Slovenian is not supported by Apple on macOS (as probably the only
official EU language, and noone knows why) yet LO is fully localized into
Slovenian since
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
--- Comment #78 from Emir Sarı (away) ---
IMHO, there is only one single and unifying Mac-like solution to this problem,
bundling all the language packs that macOS has a localisation for. If the user
speaks a language outside of
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
Paul Oranje changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
--- Comment #76 from Alex Thurgood ---
FWIW, 6.3 is supposed to be notarized, cf. bug 126409
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
--- Comment #75 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to Frank Fuchs from comment #72)
> I am happy to open a new bug report on this but I think it directly involves
> the language installation process (because the LO package is changed by it)
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
--- Comment #74 from Sierk Bornemann ---
(In reply to barefootguru from comment #73)
> Some people on this thread don’t think this is an issue. Other people on
> this thread, and in related duplicate bugs, do consider it an issue.
>
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
--- Comment #73 from barefootguru ---
The fact is installing LO with a language pack is markedly more difficult than
most Mac apps. Even with Read Me webpages and helper AppleScripts.
Some people on this thread don’t think this is an
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
--- Comment #72 from Frank Fuchs ---
@Uwe:
There is no maybe involved regarding app notarization on macOS 10.15
(Catalina).
Quote:
Mac apps, installer packages, and kernel extensions that are signed with
Developer ID must also be
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
Uwe Altmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
Sierk Bornemann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
--- Comment #70 from Frank Fuchs ---
Dear All,
we may also run into the problem that with macOS 10.15 Apple wants all Mac apps
to be "notarized" by Apple.
One of the std requirements is that no code in the notarized app is changed or
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
--- Comment #69 from Fred ---
There is a further issue with the install process.
As the script does not shut down LO afterwards, a user who opens LO immediately
post langpack install will not see the newly installed language in their
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
Uwe Altmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
Alex Thurgood changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gna...@gmail.com
--- Comment #67
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
Adolfo Jayme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
--- Comment #66 from Uwe Altmann ---
(In reply to Fred from comment #65)
> …
> Installing 5.4.1, then langpack:
>
> I get the usual "it's not from the App Store" warning, and the followup
> installer window is hiding
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
--- Comment #65 from Fred ---
(In reply to Uwe Altmann from comment #64)
> > not really user upgradeable as it doesn't speak the user's installed or
> > desired language.
> This is not quite right. Installation process by
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
Sierk Bornemann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
Uwe Altmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
--- Comment #63 from Fred ---
OK, so the "start LO once before updating" issue is now solved and automated
(cool), but the key problem is left unaddressed: the process to install a
non-US variant (i.e. core + langpack) is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
--- Comment #62 from Christian Lohmaier ---
there is no additional user interaction, the starting of LO is done
automatically.
and there is no agreement to "bundle the 5 most important languages" - after
all
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
--- Comment #61 from Fred ---
I'm not sure if the answer is bundling the 5 most prevalent languages as it
increases the volume of the application (I was already surprised by finding
dictionaries for every language on the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
Uwe Altmann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |l...@altsys.de
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
--- Comment #34 from Christian Lohmaier ---
@Uwe: If you attach your patch to the bug, there's a chance that it might make
it in time for 5.1.3 and even 5.0.6…
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
jan iversen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|ToBeReviewed|
--
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
--- Comment #33 from William Gallafent ---
I note that the GB language pack (for v5.1), at least, is not “signed by a
recognised developer”, so there is yet another hoop to jump through (alt-click
-> “open” -> “yes”)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
--- Comment #32 from Sierk Bornemann ---
(In reply to Emir Sarı (away) from comment #31)
> This bug should be regarded as a "high" importance bug, since it greatly
> distrupts user experience and creates a "this is sh*t" or
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
--- Comment #31 from Emir Sarı (away) ---
This bug should be regarded as a "high" importance bug, since it greatly
distrupts user experience and creates a "this is sh*t" or "this does not work"
(which I belive
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89657
Tor Lillqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|The lang-pack installation |The lang-pack
33 matches
Mail list logo