https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93318
--- Comment #14 from tommy27 ---
@Tomaz
looking at the code you modified it would be easier to bring back the "last"
and "first" sheet buttons like it was in 4.4.x or make it optional to see them
or not?
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93318
--- Comment #13 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Jean-Baptiste Faure from comment #12)
> These buttons do something only in the case where there is not enough room
> to see all tabs.
OMG! Why not have it always active? (Hope this questio
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93318
--- Comment #12 from Jean-Baptiste Faure ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #11)
> [...]
> BTW: In my current installation 5.0.0.5 on Windows the left/right buttons do
> not work at all.
These buttons do something only in the case
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93318
--- Comment #11 from Heiko Tietze ---
I vote for individualization in terms of a menu option '[x] Fix position' for
the add sheet and '[ ] Show first/last button' at then left/right buttons.
Both ctrl+click and double-click have disadvan
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93318
Jean-Baptiste Faure changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbfa...@libreoffice.org
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93318
Yousuf (Jay) Philips changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93318
--- Comment #8 from tommy27 ---
@Adolfo
I agree about the "plus" button.
but regarding the "double-click" vs "Ctrl+Click" I still think that the we
should change the behaviour since "double-click" is a rapid one-hand-only
action while "C
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93318
Adolfo Jayme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|libreo
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93318
--- Comment #6 from tommy27 ---
(In reply to Alex from comment #5)
> I can live with the "double-click" proposal; however, I'm not used to
> double-clicking on such controls, so without being told that such a feature
> existed I might neve
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93318
--- Comment #5 from Alex ---
I can live with the "double-click" proposal; however, I'm not used to
double-clicking on such controls, so without being told that such a feature
existed I might never discover it. What might be better, if it'
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93318
--- Comment #4 from tommy27 ---
(In reply to Tomaz Vajngerl from comment #3)
> It is not about offense but if we should take you seriously or not. I
> usually listen to users and try to find a compromise that would work for
> them but I do
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93318
--- Comment #3 from Tomaz Vajngerl ---
It is not about offense but if we should take you seriously or not. I usually
listen to users and try to find a compromise that would work for them but I
don't take any user seriously that ends every
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93318
tommy27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Calc|ux-advise
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93318
--- Comment #2 from Alex ---
I did not intend any offense in the enhancement I submitted! Please note that
I said "please" before each request, and meant it genuinely! However, I stand
behind the opinion I expressed that scarce resources
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93318
tommy27 changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ba...@quipo.it,
|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93318
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
16 matches
Mail list logo
