[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96923] Criteria evaluation of COUNTIF, COUNTIFS, SUMIF, SUMIFS, AVERAGEIF, AVERAGEIFS

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96923

Mike Kaganski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12
   ||7624

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96923] Criteria evaluation of COUNTIF, COUNTIFS, SUMIF, SUMIFS, AVERAGEIF, AVERAGEIFS

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96923

Michael Warner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|108827  |150900


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108827
[Bug 108827] [META] Calc functions bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150900
[Bug 150900] [META] Excel Functions
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96923] Criteria evaluation of COUNTIF, COUNTIFS, SUMIF, SUMIFS, AVERAGEIF, AVERAGEIFS

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96923

--- Comment #17 from kon...@gmx.com ---
Confirmed in LibreOffice 6.4.3.2.

See the attachment "Inconsistency between comparison order".

I get the following results:

1) If comparing a number to a number (2nd and 3rd argument to SUMIFS), we get a
match as expected.

2) If comparing a number to a string, we get a match.

3) If comparing a string to a number, we DON'T get a match.

4) If comparing a string to a number, but with an explicit equality operator
("="&) we get a match.

In Excel, all cases (1-4) result in a match. Because of the unexpected
inconsistency, I would say that this is indeed a bug, and that the Excel
behavior of having all four cases result in a match should be followed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96923] Criteria evaluation of COUNTIF, COUNTIFS, SUMIF, SUMIFS, AVERAGEIF, AVERAGEIFS

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96923

--- Comment #16 from kon...@gmx.com ---
Created attachment 161385
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=161385=edit
Inconsistency between comparison order

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96923] Criteria evaluation of COUNTIF, COUNTIFS, SUMIF, SUMIFS, AVERAGEIF, AVERAGEIFS

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96923

--- Comment #15 from QA Administrators  ---
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **

To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touched for over a year.

There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this
bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the
details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in
getting confirmation that the bug is still present.

If you have time, please do the following:

Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice
from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/

If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information
from Help - About LibreOffice.

If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to
RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help
- About LibreOffice.

Please DO NOT

Update the version field
Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker)
Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular
meaning that is not 
appropriate in this case)


If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a
REGRESSION. To do so:
1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your
bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from
http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/

2. Test your bug
3. Leave a comment with your results.
4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo';
4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword


Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat:
https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa

Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone!

Warm Regards,
QA Team

MassPing-UntouchedBug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 96923] Criteria evaluation of COUNTIF, COUNTIFS, SUMIF, SUMIFS, AVERAGEIF, AVERAGEIFS

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96923

Eike Rathke  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
   Hardware|x86 (IA32)  |All
Version|5.0.3.1 rc  |Inherited From OOo
Summary|Function SUMIFS |Criteria evaluation of
   ||COUNTIF, COUNTIFS, SUMIF,
   ||SUMIFS, AVERAGEIF,
   ||AVERAGEIFS
 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 OS|Windows (All)   |All

--- Comment #14 from Eike Rathke  ---
That at least seems to be consistent among all related functions, COUNTIF,
COUNTIFS, SUMIF, SUMIFS, AVERAGEIF, AVERAGEIFS.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs