[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108998] Crash in: CompareSwOutlineNodes::operator SwNode * const &, SwNode * const & (no steps)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108998

--- Comment #11 from Timur  ---
There's one in 5.4.3.2  but let's wait and see.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108998] Crash in: CompareSwOutlineNodes::operator SwNode * const &, SwNode * const & (no steps)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108998

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME

--- Comment #10 from Xisco Faulí  ---
Closing as RESOLVED WORKSFORME.
No crashes in 5.4.3.2, 5.4.4.2 or 5.3.7.2 ->
http://crashreport.libreoffice.org/stats/signature/CompareSwOutlineNodes::operator()(SwNode%20*%20const%20&,SwNode%20*%20const%20&)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108998] Crash in: CompareSwOutlineNodes::operator SwNode * const &, SwNode * const & (no steps)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108998

--- Comment #9 from Fyodor  ---
Seems that this bug relates mostly to outlining, as all crushes that I reviewed
happen when LO tries to work with SwNodes::m_pOutlineNodes
Unfortunately I'm not expert in outlining and cannot help.
Unlikely that this bug relates to Bug 94225

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108998] Crash in: CompareSwOutlineNodes::operator SwNode * const &, SwNode * const & (no steps)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108998

Timur  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fyodo...@hotmail.com

--- Comment #8 from Timur  ---
Fyodor, do you think this one is also related to Bug 94225?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108998] Crash in: CompareSwOutlineNodes::operator SwNode * const &, SwNode * const & (no steps)

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108998

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Crash in:   |Crash in:
   |CompareSwOutlineNodes::oper |CompareSwOutlineNodes::oper
   |ator   SwNode * const   |ator   SwNode * const
   |&,SwNode * const &  |&,SwNode * const &  (no
   ||steps)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108998] Crash in: CompareSwOutlineNodes::operator SwNode * const &, SwNode * const

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108998

--- Comment #7 from Timur  ---
If you deem it so, feel free. 
But I'd rather have dev take a brief look at the code pointed with this crash.
There are 80 reports now and newest version is 1 report for 5.4.1.2.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108998] Crash in: CompareSwOutlineNodes::operator SwNode * const &, SwNode * const

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108998

--- Comment #6 from Xisco Faulí  ---
So far we only have one crash in 5.4 branch ->
https://crashreport.libreoffice.org/stats/signature/CompareSwOutlineNodes::operator()(SwNode%20*%20const%20&,SwNode%20*%20const%20&)

@Timur, Should it be closed while we don't have reproducible steps?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108998] Crash in: CompareSwOutlineNodes::operator SwNode * const &, SwNode * const

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108998

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|critical|normal

--- Comment #5 from Xisco Faulí  ---
> What I ask is important in QA: if we know that there are no steps, but we
> have crash report, what then? I disagree with NeedInfo because reporter
> can't give more.

What's the point in having it unconfirmed if we can not even triage it? IMHO,
the less bugs we have in the unconfirmed list, the more we can focus on those
that can be really triaged. Developers can go directly to the crashreport page
to see the backtrace in case they need to.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108998] Crash in: CompareSwOutlineNodes::operator SwNode * const &, SwNode * const

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108998

Timur  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
 Ever confirmed|1   |0

--- Comment #4 from Timur  ---
It's clear steps are wonderful thing but steps are not available here.  
What I ask is important in QA: if we know that there are no steps, but we have
crash report, what then? I disagree with NeedInfo because reporter can't give
more. 
I see 56 reports now for this, so increasing (bad) but still last is 5.3.4.2
(good).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108998] Crash in: CompareSwOutlineNodes::operator SwNode * const &, SwNode * const

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108998

--- Comment #3 from Xisco Faulí  ---
(In reply to Timur from comment #2)
> It will be hard to reproduce. Since there are those 49 reports, last being
> 5.3.4.2, I'd rather put this on New. 
> Are you sure Crash Report can't be used without steps? I thought they are
> not necessary if report available. 
> 
> My report is
> http://crashreport.libreoffice.org/stats/crash_details/f8014787-1f7d-48fb-
> 85f3-6e5e7917b9c5.

I wouldn't use the rule 'crashreport equals to NEW' since even a core developer
might not know where the problem is. Besides, having the steps to reproduced
easier things for developers and QA.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108998] Crash in: CompareSwOutlineNodes::operator SwNode * const &, SwNode * const

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108998

--- Comment #2 from Timur  ---
It will be hard to reproduce. Since there are those 49 reports, last being
5.3.4.2, I'd rather put this on New. 
Are you sure Crash Report can't be used without steps? I thought they are not
necessary if report available. 

My report is
http://crashreport.libreoffice.org/stats/crash_details/f8014787-1f7d-48fb-85f3-6e5e7917b9c5.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108998] Crash in: CompareSwOutlineNodes::operator SwNode * const &, SwNode * const

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108998

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #1 from Xisco Faulí  ---
Changing it to NEEDINFO until we know the steps to reproduce it.
Anyway, thanks for reporting this

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108998] Crash in: CompareSwOutlineNodes::operator SwNode * const &, SwNode * const

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108998

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org
Crash report or|CompareSwOutlineNodes::oper |["CompareSwOutlineNodes::op
crash signature|ator   SwNode * const   |erator()(SwNode * const
   |&,SwNode * const &  |&,SwNode * const &)"]

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108998] Crash in: CompareSwOutlineNodes::operator SwNode * const &, SwNode * const

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108998

Timur  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|major   |critical

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs