https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117102
--- Comment #19 from Dr. Matthias Weisser ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #18)
> It's an "arbitrary" value between 0 and 100. Actually this type of value is
> called interval scale (vs. ratio)
thank you Heiko !
> So you are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117102
--- Comment #18 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Dr. Matthias Weisser from comment #17)
> whats the reason for giving this field then?
It's an "arbitrary" value between 0 and 100. Actually this type of value is
called interval scale (v
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117102
--- Comment #17 from Dr. Matthias Weisser ---
(In reply to Dr. Matthias Weisser from comment #13)
> its not possible using the percent values as has been shown clearly.
> its possible using the cm values.
"I don't see a reason to enter a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117102
--- Comment #16 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Dr. Matthias Weisser from comment #13)
> its not possible using the percent values as has been shown clearly.
> its possible using the cm values.
I don't see a reason to enter a _precise
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117102
--- Comment #15 from Dr. Matthias Weisser ---
I agree to Tomaz !
May be at least one decimal to have would be fine. Technically this should be
no problem. Other fields also have decimal values.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117102
--- Comment #14 from Tomaz Vajngerl ---
I would say that yes - images scale factor shouldn't be rounded to the percent
but offer sub percent precision (2 decimal points).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117102
Dieter Praas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117102
Dr. Matthias Weisser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resoluti
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117102
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117102
Thomas Lendo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||103270
Referenced Bugs:
https:/
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117102
--- Comment #12 from Heiko Tietze ---
You can adjust the actual size very precisely and go with 25.7cm (page a4 -2x
2cm spacing).
That works for me perfectly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.__
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117102
Dieter Praas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117102
--- Comment #10 from Dr. Matthias Weisser ---
Hello Dieter,
you write:
"I still have Scaling of 62% and 61%, and I don't know why."
I also do not why this is so with your system.
I am using Win7 64bit, LO5.3.7.2 and my system does show
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117102
--- Comment #6 from Dr. Matthias Weisser ---
Created attachment 141501
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=141501&action=edit
file to show problem with picture of scale factor included
with this file there can be
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117102
--- Comment #9 from Dieter Praas ---
Created attachment 141504
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=141504&action=edit
document with image that is in align with page borders
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117102
--- Comment #7 from Dr. Matthias Weisser ---
what is the sense of the field "Skalierung" when not being used to scale the
size of the picture?
I wrote 13 books in the last 15 years and thousands of times used this field
"Skalierung" for
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117102
--- Comment #8 from Dieter Praas ---
Created attachment 141503
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=141503&action=edit
Screenshot that shows scaling factor
I still have Scaling of 62% and 61%, and I don't know why.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117102
--- Comment #5 from Dieter Praas ---
O. K., now it is clear to me.
When I open you attachment 141494 the scale factor is 62% (Width) and 61%
(Heigth). I think the scale factor is only important, if you crop a picture.
You rezise the pict
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117102
Dr. Matthias Weisser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|picture zoom not fine |picture scaling not fine
19 matches
Mail list logo
