https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
Mike Cowlishaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
--- Comment #21 from Mike Cowlishaw ---
Happy to report that the prblem has been fixed in 7.1.0.3.
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffic
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
--- Comment #20 from QA Administrators ---
Dear Mike Cowlishaw,
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
--- Comment #19 from Mike Cowlishaw ---
Hi, thanks for the reply -- but that old version paginates differently and
line-breaks differently. So an index generated with the old version will not
match the documented edited with a newer vers
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
--- Comment #18 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to Mike Cowlishaw from comment #17)
> I find I am still confused; in comment 14:
>
> "If you update the index in a version without the problem, the undesired
> formatting goes away."
>
> ...
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
--- Comment #17 from Mike Cowlishaw ---
I find I am still confused; in comment 14:
"If you update the index in a version without the problem, the undesired
formatting goes away."
... so which current version does not have the problem?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
--- Comment #16 from Mike Cowlishaw ---
This IEEE Standard revision is now in ballot, so I have taken the opportunity
to upgrade LibreOffice from 5.4.7.2 (x64) to 6.0.7.3 (x64).
Unfortunately this problem does not appear to be fixed. I
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
Timur changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||89606
Re
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
Korrawit Pruegsanusak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #143594|application/octet-stream|application/vnd.oasis.ope
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
--- Comment #15 from Mike Cowlishaw ---
Sounds good -- thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
--- Comment #14 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to Mike Cowlishaw from comment #13)
> Not sure what "Nothing happens" means here -- is the problem now fixed?
> I.e., is it safe to try new version of LibreOffice? (I am currently on a
> 5.x v
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
--- Comment #13 from Mike Cowlishaw ---
Not sure what "Nothing happens" means here -- is the problem now fixed? I.e.,
is it safe to try new version of LibreOffice? (I am currently on a 5.x version
and using a script to fix the XML conte
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected, bisected
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
--- Comment #11 from Mike Cowlishaw ---
Saving with an earlier version isn't really an option because the document
approved by the committee was/is saved by the current version. Also, I have
low confidence that pagination would be unchan
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
Timur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|x86-64 (AMD64) |All
Version|5.4.7.2 release
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
--- Comment #9 from Mike Cowlishaw ---
OK, have managed to create an .odt with 1 page source and index generated from
it. Have attached.
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
--- Comment #8 from Mike Cowlishaw ---
Created attachment 143594
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=143594&action=edit
Source .odt 1-page extract + generated index
This is one page of the current IEEE 754 draft s
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
--- Comment #7 from Mike Cowlishaw ---
Ah, thanks, I wasn't aware of those shortcuts. Will give it a try at the
weekend (travelling mañana).
Mike
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
--- Comment #6 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Mike Cowlishaw from comment #5)
> Is there a way to (say) delete pages 1-60 and 62-80? This is a big document,
> so select and delete would be extremely tedious...
Well - still you ne
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
--- Comment #5 from Mike Cowlishaw ---
On the example source:
I'd hoped my inclusion of the XML source was sufficient, but if not I can try
and make a cut-down version of the source to reproduce from scratch. Is there
a way to (say) d
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
--- Comment #4 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Mike Cowlishaw from comment #3)
> It's a bit difficult to provide the full source as this is an IEEE standard
> under revision and not approved. In particular it could not be posted to a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
Mike Cowlishaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118722
Mike Cowlishaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@speleotrove.com
--- Commen
25 matches
Mail list logo
