https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124710
--- Comment #13 from QA Administrators ---
Dear forouhcr,
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been touch
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124710
Winfried Donkers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|winfri
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124710
Winfried Donkers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |winfrieddonkers@libreoffice
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124710
Xisco FaulĂ changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124710
Winfried Donkers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |winfrieddonkers@libreoffice
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124710
--- Comment #8 from Winfried Donkers ---
(In reply to Eike Rathke from comment #6)
> Shortest reproducer:
>
> =IFS( 0, NA(), 1+0, "no idea")
I know what happens, but not yet why.
The raw stacktype for the arguments in ScInterpreter::S
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124710
Winfried Donkers changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||winfrieddonkers@libreoffice
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124710
Eike Rathke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[1] IFS function mishandles |IFS function erroneously