[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||124891 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124891 [Bug 124891] [META] Basic IDE bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #39 from Buovjaga --- (In reply to Hans-Werner from comment #15) > E x t e n s i o n s > > [1] Code Highlighter > > https://extensions.libreoffice.org/en/extensions/show/code-highlighter > > Not working, only error message: > > Ein Scripting Framework Fehler trat während der Ausführung vom Python Skript > vnd.sun.star.script:codehighlighter.oxt|python|highlight. > py$highlight_qbasic_default?language=Python=user:uno_packages auf. > Meldung: : 'codehighlighter.oxt' > File "C:\Program Files\LibreOffice\program\pythonscript.py", line 1046, in > getScript > storageUri = self.provCtx.getStorageUrlFromPersistentUrl( > File "C:\Program Files\LibreOffice\program\pythonscript.py", line 417, in > getStorageUrlFromPersistentUrl > package = self.mapPackageName2Path[ packageName ]" Good news: Jean-Marc Zambon has picked up the maintenance of this extension. You can try it by downloading the "source code" in the releases, inside the archive you will find the .oxt extension file: https://github.com/jmzambon/libreoffice-code-highlighter/releases -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #38 from Andrew Pitonyak --- Copying to the clipboard using a rich text format as one of the formats would probably suffice and might be easier to implement. I have not attempted to read the IDE implementation code, so I could be wrong. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #37 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Hans-Werner from comment #36) > But what's about the question [3] of "Comment 28" ? Writer document is preferably style-oriented text. You would have to create for each line a special paragraph style per code style (Basic, Python, Java...) plus numerous character styles to make parts in bold, italic, colored etc. Printing and exporting to PDF / bitmap formats is a more character-oriented procedure since you never reuse the content anywhere else. And as I commented before, the Basic colorization is likely not available at different modules. In other words, you don't write/modify code in Writer (nor you want to reuse the formatting) but want to share a static result - a screenshot. And again my disclaimer: the desire is clear and valuable from the UX POV (my expertise here). Volunteers who want to do the effort are very welcome. But I would not steer resources, if there was any, into it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380
--- Comment #36 from Hans-Werner ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #34)
Many thanks for answering the questions [1],[2] and [4] of "Comment 28" :-))
But what's about the question [3] of "Comment 28" ?
Code colorizing is already part of the core, because the basic macro code
browsed by the "LO Basic IDE" (Integrated Development Environment) is colorized
(Attachment: LO 7.3.4.2 (x64) - Basic IDE - ScreenPrint.png).
Therefore ("Comment 28"):
"[...] [3] Why not to replace the printing feature by an export-to-writer
feature ? [...] What's about to use directly or indirectly the already existing
code colorizer of the Basic-IDE. For example, could it be possible to code some
software that exports the displayed basic macro code in a writer document and
replaces the SCREEN-color-tags by WRITER-color tags ? [...]"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #35 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180810 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180810=edit LO 7.3.4.2 (x64) - Basic IDE - ScreenPrint -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needsUXEval | Priority|medium |low CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |and...@pitonyak.org, |.freedesktop.org|heiko.tietze@documentfounda ||tion.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #34 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Hans-Werner from comment #15) > [3] Code Colorizer Formatter (Pitonyak) > https://extensions.libreoffice.org/en/extensions/show/71 > Very good colorizing, but not exactly like "LO Basic IDE" colorizing: Code highlighting is a can of worms and better suited for a macro. If this one isn't working it might be good to fix the issues there. Andrew Pitonyak (CC) is an experienced and active macro developer. > C o r e f e a t u r e ? > [1] The Basic IDE is part of the core and therefore the Basic IDE printing > feature [File]>[Print] is part of the core too. Isn't it ? It's a module and likely using different code. > [2] The Basic IDE printing feature seems to be a little bit old-fashioned, > only black-and-white printing is possible contrary to the colorized basic > macro code displayed by the Basic IDE. There's no "What You See Is What You > Get" ... Agreed on the need to improve, if true (haven't tested myself). And if you can print/export it would be possible to insert the PDF. I suggest to check if we have a ticket about this aspect and file one otherwise. > [4] The language of the descriptions of the (most) extensions is English. > What's about LO users, that don't speak English ? If [3] could be realized, > the language would be automatically the language of the LO version the user > is using. Valid argument for a core feature but not a strong one. So in a nutshell no objection for a core implementation - if someone volunteers. Guess it's quite some effort for a limited benefit resp. some benefit for only a few users. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #33 from Hans-Werner --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #32) > (In reply to Hans-Werner from comment #0) > > The better way surely would be to use the Basic-IDE display data while the > > basic code is displayed by the Basic-IDE, but this would be a big job to be > > realized and - in my opinion - not be done by LO developers next time > > because of other more important work to be done. > > I fully agree- the desire for source code (actually only sbasic) as OLE > object is clear. But there are more important things to do. And I appreciate > features that are maintained in parallel - in other words extensions. > Therefore I would upload the extension to our site and not implement this > into core. Other opinions? The "Let's ask UX team" questions are to be found in "Comment 28" (2022-06-06) and not in "Comment 0" (2020-11-20) ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC||samuel.mehrbrodt@allotropia ||.de --- Comment #32 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Hans-Werner from comment #0) > The better way surely would be to use the Basic-IDE display data while the > basic code is displayed by the Basic-IDE, but this would be a big job to be > realized and - in my opinion - not be done by LO developers next time > because of other more important work to be done. I fully agree- the desire for source code (actually only sbasic) as OLE object is clear. But there are more important things to do. And I appreciate features that are maintained in parallel - in other words extensions. Therefore I would upload the extension to our site and not implement this into core. Other opinions? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #31 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180602 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180602=edit CCB - User Manual DEU -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #30 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180601 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180601=edit CCB - User Manual ENG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #29 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180600 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180600=edit CCB -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Keywords||needsUXEval Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED --- Comment #28 from Buovjaga --- (In reply to Hans-Werner from comment #15) > C o r e f e a t u r e ? > > [1] The Basic IDE is part of the core and therefore the Basic IDE printing > feature [File]>[Print] is part of the core too. Isn't it ? > > [2] The Basic IDE printing feature seems to be a little bit old-fashioned, > only black-and-white printing is possible contrary to the colorized basic > macro code displayed by the Basic IDE. There's no "What You See Is What You > Get" ... > > [3] Why not to replace the printing feature by an export-to-writer feature ? > Colorizing basic macro code outside LO in the same way as is displayed by > the Basic IDE is complex, difficult and error-prone. What's about to use > directly or indirectly the already existing code colorizer of the Basic-IDE. > For example, could it be possible to code some software that exports the > displayed basic macro code in a writer document and replaces the > SCREEN-color-tags by WRITER-color tags ? > > [4] The language of the descriptions of the (most) extensions is English. > What's about LO users, that don't speak English ? If [3] could be realized, > the language would be automatically the language of the LO version the user > is using. Let's ask UX team -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #27 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180599 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180599=edit TestData - CodeColorizerBasic -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #26 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180598 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180598=edit TestData - Code Colorizer Formatter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #25 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180597 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180597=edit TestData - coooder - vbnet -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #24 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180596 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180596=edit TestData - coooder - vb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #23 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180595 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180595=edit TestData - coooder - qbasic -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #22 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180594 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180594=edit TestData - coooder - freebasic -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #21 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180593 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180593=edit TestData - coooder - blitzbasic -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #20 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180592 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180592=edit TestData - coooder - basic4gl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #19 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180591 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180591=edit TestData - LO Basic IDE - ScreenPrint Part 3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #18 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180590 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180590=edit TestData - LO Basic IDE - ScreenPrint Part 2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #17 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180589 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180589=edit TestData - LO Basic IDE - ScreenPrint Part 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 Hans-Werner changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #168747|0 |1 is obsolete|| Attachment #168748|0 |1 is obsolete|| Attachment #168751|0 |1 is obsolete|| Attachment #168754|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #16 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 180588 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180588=edit TestData -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380
--- Comment #15 from Hans-Werner ---
OS: Windows 10 Home (21H2 - 19044.1741)
LO: 7.2.7.2 (x64) + 7.3.3.2 (x64) (LibreOffice Community)
T e s t D a t a
Used for testing the macro basic code colorizing extensions:
Attachment: "TestData.txt"
TestData as to be seen in the LO Basic IDE:
Attachment: "TestData - LO Basic IDE - ScreenPrint Part 1.png"
Attachment: "TestData - LO Basic IDE - ScreenPrint Part 2.png"
Attachment: "TestData - LO Basic IDE - ScreenPrint Part 3.png"
Colors: Blue, Green, Red, Grey (only for comments) and Black (only for # @).
E x t e n s i o n s
[1] Code Highlighter
https://extensions.libreoffice.org/en/extensions/show/code-highlighter
Not working, only error message:
Ein Scripting Framework Fehler trat während der Ausführung vom Python Skript
vnd.sun.star.script:codehighlighter.oxt|python|highlight.py$highlight_qbasic_default?language=Python=user:uno_packages
auf.
Meldung: : 'codehighlighter.oxt'
File "C:\Program Files\LibreOffice\program\pythonscript.py", line 1046, in
getScript
storageUri = self.provCtx.getStorageUrlFromPersistentUrl(
File "C:\Program Files\LibreOffice\program\pythonscript.py", line 417, in
getStorageUrlFromPersistentUrl
package = self.mapPackageName2Path[ packageName ]"
[2] coooder
https://extensions.libreoffice.org/en/extensions/show/coooder
No basic dialect found were basic macro code is colorized similar to the
colorizing of the LO Basic IDE:
Attachment: "TestData - coooder - basic4gl.odt"
Attachment: "TestData - coooder - blitzbasic.odt"
Attachment: "TestData - coooder - freebasic.odt"
Attachment: "TestData - coooder - qbasic.odt"
Attachment: "TestData - coooder - vb.odt"
Attachment: "TestData - coooder - vbnet.odt"
[3] Code Colorizer Formatter (Pitonyak)
https://extensions.libreoffice.org/en/extensions/show/71
Very good colorizing, but not exactly like "LO Basic IDE" colorizing:
+ All special characters (outside strings) "( ) [ ] % ! $ : = - + &" are
colorized "black", but should be colorized "dark blue". Only "@ #" should be
colorized "black".
+ Variable names enclosed by square brackets are mixed colorized ("dark green"
and "dark blue"), but should be colorized "dark green".
+ "Chr()", "InStr()" and "MsgBox()" are colorized "dark blue", but should be
colorized "dark green".
+ "HEX" and "OCT" numbers are mixed colorized ("black" and "dark green") but
should be colorized "red".
+ "REM", "REm", "Rem" and "rem" are colorized "dark blue", but should be
colorized "grey".
Attachment: "TestData - Code Colorizer Formatter.odt"
[4] CodeColorizerBasic (no extension, basic macro)
Uses for colorizing only regular expressions. No errors to be found. But this
does not mean, that errors could never be found ...
Attachment: "TestData - CodeColorizerBasic.odt"
C o r e f e a t u r e ?
[1] The Basic IDE is part of the core and therefore the Basic IDE printing
feature [File]>[Print] is part of the core too. Isn't it ?
[2] The Basic IDE printing feature seems to be a little bit old-fashioned, only
black-and-white printing is possible contrary to the colorized basic macro code
displayed by the Basic IDE. There's no "What You See Is What You Get" ...
[3] Why not to replace the printing feature by an export-to-writer feature ?
Colorizing basic macro code outside LO in the same way as is displayed by the
Basic IDE is complex, difficult and error-prone. What's about to use directly
or indirectly the already existing code colorizer of the Basic-IDE. For
example, could it be possible to code some software that exports the displayed
basic macro code in a writer document and replaces the SCREEN-color-tags by
WRITER-color tags ?
[4] The language of the descriptions of the (most) extensions is English.
What's about LO users, that don't speak English ? If [3] could be realized, the
language would be automatically the language of the LO version the user is
using.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #14 from QA Administrators --- Dear Hans-Werner, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff ||ice.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #13 from Buovjaga --- What about all these extensions: https://extensions.libreoffice.org/en/extensions/show/71 https://extensions.libreoffice.org/en/extensions/show/code-highlighter https://extensions.libreoffice.org/en/extensions/show/coooder I'm not sure, if this should be a core feature. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 Hans-Werner changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #168750|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #12 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 168754 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=168754=edit CodeColorizerBasic - Info DEU.odt Updated CodeColorizerBasic - Info DEU.odt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 Hans-Werner changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #168749|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #11 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 168751 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=168751=edit CodeColorizerBasic - Info ENG.odt Updated CodeColorizerBasic - Info ENG.odt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 Hans-Werner changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #167495|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #10 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 168750 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=168750=edit CodeColorizerBasic - Info DEU.odt Updated CodeColorizerBasic - Info DEU.odt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 Hans-Werner changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #167435|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #9 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 168749 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=168749=edit CodeColorizerBasic - Info ENG.odt Updated CodeColorizerBasic - Info ENG.odt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 Hans-Werner changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #167434|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #8 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 168748 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=168748=edit CodeColorizerBasic.odt Updated CodeColorizerBasic.odt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 Hans-Werner changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #167433|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #7 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 168747 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=168747=edit CodeColorizerBasic.bas Updated: CodeColorizerBasic.bas -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #6 from Justin L --- *** Bug 138379 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 Hans-Werner changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #167436|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #5 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 167495 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=167495=edit CodeColorizerBasic - Info ENG.odt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #3 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 167435 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=167435=edit CodeColorizerBasic - ReferenceData.odt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #4 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 167436 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=167436=edit CodeColorizerBasic - Info ENG.odt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #2 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 167434 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=167434=edit CodeColorizerBasic.odt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 138380] Basic-IDE - Missing feature to export COLORIZED basic code in a WRITER document + Workaround
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138380 --- Comment #1 from Hans-Werner --- Created attachment 167433 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=167433=edit CodeColorizerBasic.bas -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
