https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #50 from Roman ---
This problem is produced entirely on the @cifs@ protocol
As I read a little here, there is a nobrl function, but in contrast to it, I’ll
say that during multi-user work with a file, the lock file flies away,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alimek...@basealt.ru
--- Comment #
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #48 from Justin L ---
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #47)
Julien's error is excep.Message = "folder exists and overwrite forbidden"
I would expect that utl::UCBContentHelper::ensureFolder would be able to catch
the exc
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentf
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Timur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|backup copy fails when |backup copy fails when
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||haveBacktrace
--
You are receivin
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||serval2...@yahoo.fr
--- Comment #4
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
mart...@web.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
--- Comment #46 from mart.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|serval2...@yahoo.fr |
Status|NEEDINFO
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #44 from HansPL ---
The "nobrl" (no byte range lock) cifs mount option works for me (see comment 37
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004#c37 ).
>From my /etc/fstab: cifs vers=3.0,nobrl,users,noauto,cr
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #43 from mart...@web.de ---
10 years later :)
Still the same issue with libreoffice 7.3.4.2
Ubuntu 22.04
smb from NAS:
cifs
vers=1.0,x-systemd.automount,noauto,file_mode=0640,dir_mode=0750,credentials=
...
If this is a SMB
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Justin L changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|7.0 all versions|Inherited From OOo
OS|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
EricI changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|All |Linux (All)
Version|Inherited
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||serval2...@yahoo.fr
St
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #40 from Alexandre Laurent ---
I have noticed something else:
- if I open a file on the samba share with LibreOffice and I copy/paste the
file using Caja (MATE file explorer), I have the following error: "Error during
"splicing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #39 from Alexandre Laurent ---
Hello,
I am encountering this same issue. Here, some details:
- I am using Linux Manjaro (MATE Edition)
- I am using LibreOffice 7.1.1.2
- I have a SAMBA server on Armbian 21.02.3 Buster with Lin
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||franzb...@web.de
--- Comment #38 f
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #37 from iwi900 ---
Still same issue with 6.3.0.4.
However, there is a 9 year old (!) report
(http://blog.gresch.de/2010/06/03/openofficesambacifs-probleme-could-not-create-backup-copy/)
that suggests adding the "nobrl" option
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Aron Budea changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||77999
Referenced Bugs:
https://bug
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #36 from mart...@web.de ---
still same issue with:
Version: 6.0.3.2
Build-ID: 6.0.3.2-5.fc28
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
tomraymond...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|All |x86 (IA32)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Aron Budea changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|x86 (IA32) |All
OS|Windows (All)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Justin L changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|x86 (IA32) |All
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #34 from Uwe Dippel ---
Yes, thanks for the reminder!
Actually I used to be a developer myself, voluntarily and in some small
portions paid.
With both hats I tried to get priorities right: not niceness over function.
No projec
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #33 from Cor Nouws ---
(In reply to Uwe Dippel from comment #31)
> My frustration might come from me evangelizing FOSS for the last 20 years,
> using it throughout. This bug has been creeping around for the last around 9
> yea
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #32 from Cor Nouws ---
(In reply to Uwe Dippel from comment #31)
> Who defines necessary improvements and the relevance of 'modernizing stuff'?
People working on it. Either voluntary, or because they get paid.
> Though time
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #31 from Uwe Dippel ---
"Devs are constantly busy with all kind of bugs and necessary improvement or
modernizing stuff."
Who defines necessary improvements and the relevance of 'modernizing stuff'?
To me it sounds like doctor
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Aron Budea changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ba...@caesar.elte.hu
Blo
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #30 from Cor Nouws ---
Hi Hans,
(In reply to HansPL from comment #29)
> Does any dev at all watch this bug thread?
Devs are constantly busy with all kind of bugs and necessary improvement or
modernizing stuff.
There is alwa
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
HansPL changed:
What|Removed |Added
OS|Linux (All) |All
--- Comment #29 from HansPL ---
Doe
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #28 from Alex Thurgood ---
I encountered this problem years ago when using OpenOffice.org 2.X saving to a
SMB server share on a Linux server at the time with a support contract. It was
unsolvable then, and the only workaround w
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #27 from Carlos Le Mare ---
To us happened the same. Tjhe problem start yesterday when we got a power
failure and some files opened over the samba network got size 0, and when we
start libreoffice again it didn't ask to restore
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #26 from HansPL ---
Still defunct in 5.1.2.2.0+ / Linux!
I would really wish that the LO team would spend time on fixing all those
annoying year-old known bugs instead of just ignoring them and instead
unnecessarily adding g
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #25 from Eugene Saenko ---
Correction.
Backup file created, but length=0:
[ses@ses-comp backup]$ pwd
/home/ses/.config/libreoffice/4/user/backup
[ses@ses-comp backup]$ ls -l
total 0
-rwxr-xr-x 1 ses ses 0 Feb 11 14:33 qq.bak
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #24 from Eugene Saenko ---
Version: 5.0.4.2
Build ID: 5.0.4.2-3.fc23
Locale: ru-RU (ru_RU.UTF-8)
Fedora-23.i686
[ses@ses-comp ~]$ mount | grep cifs
//dz250/ses on /home/ses/samba/DZ250/ses type cifs
(rw,relatime,vers=1.0,cache=
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #23 from mart...@web.de ---
Bug still the same on Fedora 23:
libreoffice-*-5.0.3.1-1.fc23.x86_64
backupfile: ~/.config/libreoffice/4/user/backup
though I wonder "4" is still used. I expected "5".
Error message and a zero byt
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #22 from QA Administrators ---
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to rete
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|3.6.5.2 release |Inherited From OOo
--- Comment #21 from Cor
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #20 from Eugene ---
> Some version 3... But LibreOffice or our predecessor?
I just found in my notes that I reported this bug for OOo-2.x
WBR
Eugene
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
__
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #19 from HansPL ---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Some version 3... But LibreOffice or our predecessor?
Oh — right, that must have still been OOo then.
Hans
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #18 from Eugene ---
As I remember this bug was already in 2011 year. I did ask advice on it from
one of my friends in e-mail. What version was I don't remember.
Eugene
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee fo
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #17 from Cor Nouws ---
Hi Hans,
(In reply to comment #16)
> > Indeed. There are ways to solve this for those that do not want to wait for
>
> Ehm… which ways? (Please don't say MS Office)
Ha - of course not. But some larger organi
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #16 from HansPL ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Indeed. There are ways to solve this for those that do not want to wait for
Ehm… which ways? (Please don't say MS Office)
>
> Question: did this work before version 3.6.5.2 ?
Yes,
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|medium |high
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #14 from Eugene ---
+1
It's huge inconvenience in a corporative environment/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Lib
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
HansPL changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |major
--- Comment #13 from HansPL ---
Two year
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
ign_christian changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||et...@stoneleaf.us
--- Comment #12 from
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #11 from HansPL ---
FWIW: our CIFS server is openSUSE 12.1, Samba version
3.6.3-34.11.1-2788-SUSE-SL12.1-x86_64 with unix extensions = no
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #10 from HansPL ---
CONFIRMED here with LO 4.0.3 and LO 4.1.2.3 on Linux Mint Debian Ed., also on
Win7. Didn't really notice it with LO 3.x before, but now it is permanent:
Editing and saving a writer or calc file on a local ext
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Maxim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
Version|4.0.2.2 release
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Maxim changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cas...@pisem.net
--- Comment #7 from Maxim ---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Maxim changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||udip...@gmail.com
--- Comment #8 from Maxim ---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Uwe Dippel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Hardware|Other |x86 (IA32)
OS|All
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Jacques Guilleron changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||guillero...@aol.com
See Al
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #4 from mart...@web.de ---
> have you tried one of the 4.x builds (either the stable 4.0.4 or the dev
> build 4.1.0.1RC)?
Just installed fc19 on different machine:
libreoffice-core-4.1.0.1-3.fc19.x86_64
same error:
Samba + "Always
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #3 from thack...@nexgo.de ---
Hello Martin, *,
(In reply to comment #2)
> (In reply to comment #1)
> > have you tried a newer version of LO than 3.6.0.4? Does your problem occurs
> > there, too? I have no samba here to test, so this is
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
--- Comment #2 from mart...@web.de ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Hello Martin, *,
> have you tried a newer version of LO than 3.6.0.4? Does your problem occurs
> there, too? I have no samba here to test, so this is only a little reminder
> ... ;)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
thack...@nexgo.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
Ever confirmed|0
58 matches
Mail list logo
