https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #39 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #36)
> I'm still not quite happy with the sidebar dynamics. And I get they feeling
> there is some kind of misunderstanding... Or the whole discussion has ende
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #38 from andreas_k ---
I am all for one global default size which will improve the work on .UI files a
lot, cause design e.g. galleries was horrible before I define myself that the
gallery sidebar will have 3 column's. Same for
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kain...@gmail.com
--- Comment #37
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tele...@surfxs.nl
--- Comment #3
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
Thomas Lendo changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #33 from V Stuart Foote ---
*** Bug 92317 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bu
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lukebe...@hotmail.com
--- Commen
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #34 from V Stuart Foote ---
*** Bug 83526 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bu
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
Luke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|SIDEBAR: Having the sidebar |SIDEBAR: Having the sidebar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #27 from Luke ---
(In reply to Thomas Lendo from comment #26)
> I'm against any fix width of the sidebar. For comparison: Also in MSO Word
> 2013 the user can freely choose the width of sidebars
Thomas,
No one is asking for
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
Thomas Lendo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thomas.le...@gmail.com
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #24 from Luke ---
> It sucks now because nothing is retained. But that will get fixed, and then
> what? Moving beyond current implementation is better served by keeping things
> flexible--not by locking it down.
So basically
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #23 from Bastián Díaz ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #22)
> There is nothing wrong with giving the users that flexibility. It sucks now
> because nothing is retained. But that will get fixed, and then what? Moving
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #22 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Luke from comment #21)
> ... Once the pane is detached, the sidebar is no longer a sidebar.
> It's not at all related to this topic. Width limits on them are separate
> issue all togethe
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #21 from Luke ---
V Stuart,
You talk about all of these great UI features that we give the users like
detaching the pane as if they are somehow in conflict with this feature. They
are NOT. Once the pane is detached, the sidebar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #20 from Bastián Díaz ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #19)
> Sure, if the Sidebar were a static UI element we could make a case for fixed
> static structure. However, we quickly migrated it from .src to GTK .UI bas
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #19 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Bastián Díaz from comment #18)
> So what is the solution?
>
> To me, a min/max for the sidebar is not a way of "personalization" is a way
> to add consistency to the contents of the sid
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #18 from Bastián Díaz ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #17)
> Absolutely! And that is the granularity of Sidebar customization that we
> need to provide users. We closed this issue as described in its summary
> bec
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #17 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Luke from comment #16)
> As a sidebar user, the only state I care to manage is open or closed, open
> to focus on properties or closed to focus on content. I do NOT want to
> micromanage
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #16 from Luke ---
V Stuart,
Bug 67770 is about the sidebar -> customization option being remembered. Where
do you get the idea it's about remembering sidebar widths? If so, that's a
terrible idea. You do not want the sidebar co
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #15 from V Stuart Foote ---
Sure I'm fine with reopening. But my position remains as in comment 9 --
individually set minimums are reasonable, but *no* to setting a global fixed
minimum width for any content panel active in t
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
Luke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|WONTFIX
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on|92317 |
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||92317
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||diaz.bast...@openmailbox.or
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #11 from V Stuart Foote ---
The Sidebar deck already provides for contextual adjustments to active Content
Panels. GtkGrid holds widgets pinned right or pinned left. Dropdowns and
spinners resize (with or without minimum). Scr
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #10 from Heiko Tietze ---
Resizing sidebars allows to adopt to different content over tools but not
within. As a user I have no benefit from resizing (exaggerated spoken).
On the other hand, Eve [1] might want to have more in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #9 from V Stuart Foote ---
(In reply to Jay Philips from comment #8)
> Is there a point to be able to shrinking down the width of a tab so that the
> controls start to disappear, similar to the attached image.
>
Sure, you can
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #8 from Jay Philips ---
Created attachment 115094
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=115094&action=edit
sidebar tabs cropped
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #7)
> Created attachment 115092 [de
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #7 from V Stuart Foote ---
Created attachment 115092
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=115092&action=edit
indicator when drag resizing Deck is about to collapse closed
(In reply to Jay Philips from co
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #6 from Jay Philips ---
So is a minimum width agreeable.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #5 from Adolfo Jayme ---
This is like going back to the previous .src-based dialogs, with their
hardcoded sizes and issues with localizations. Just don’t.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the b
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #4 from mahfiaz ---
I think we should keep minimum width in mind, but not make the width fixed. In
some cases making it wider because of styles dialog names, especially when
using larger UI font, or because of the font dropdown
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
Jay Philips changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--- Comment #3 from Jay Philips
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
--- Comment #2 from Jay Philips ---
Stuart,
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #1)
> IMHO do not agree *at all*. A fixed Sidebar Deck area locks us into a fixed
> Sidebar layout. Stretching and shrinking the Sidebar is needed to
> a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90374
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
CC|
43 matches
Mail list logo
