https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cg...@free.fr
--- Com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||4ae66ce...@c0x0.com
-
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentf
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
--- Comment #39 from Miklos Vajna ---
Perhaps a separate bug is better, since this bug is specific to Windows.
Testing your use-case in a debug build (where warnings are printed on the
console) may be useful. Last time I tested, both a HW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
--- Comment #38 from Alex Thurgood ---
What about a similar issue I see on macOS Arm Silicon ?
Should I open a separate report ?
I have an EIDAS hardware certificate (USB key) issued by CertEurope that uses
Trusted Key Manager for making
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
--- Comment #37 from RolandVL ---
In contrast what the heading is saying, I find no bug when I add a digital
signature to an existing pdf file. I sign the pdf with my identity card (eID)
with a smartcardreader (type Vasco Digipass 870 with
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
--- Comment #36 from J ---
This seems to affect at least 7.2.4.1 x64/win 10 version also - after selecting
an X.509 certificate for signing, no signatures are added to the document
(either pdf of odt)
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
Ferry Toth changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://www.codella.biz/|
--
You are receiving this mail bec
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
Codella changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://www.codella.biz/
--
You are re
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #119447|1 |0
is obsolete|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #119449|1 |0
is obsolete|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #119448|1 |0
is obsolete|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #159181|1 |0
is obsolete|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #161541|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
THE_N4R4NT changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #119447|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
--- Comment #32 from narsimha ---
https://techkalture.com/1337x-to-proxy-torrents/
https://techkalture.com/1337x-to-proxy-torrents/
https://techkalture.com/top-tips-for-planning-your-law-firms-marketing/
https://techkalture.com/top-reason
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
--- Comment #31 from amy ---
Movierulz website has been changing frequently because they have banned by
government of India. so you can follow this web page for movierulz latest
website. Here we will update the movierulz latest url to watc
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
amy changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://supplementsultra.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
--- Comment #29 from NISZ LibreOffice Team ---
Created attachment 159181
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=159181&action=edit
xmlsecurity certs work, GovCA ones don't
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
Ever conf
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
--- Comment #27 from QA Administrators ---
Dear Oliver Ostertag,
This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
--- Comment #26 from stavrosss ---
Yes this bug is about that. It would be useful if we had a test build of
Libreoffice 6.XX version with the problematic patch reverted so that we could
test it the bug is not present.
"Anyhow, please don'
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
--- Comment #25 from Miklos Vajna ---
Perhaps I misremember, best to look at the code. :-)
What I remembered is that we always create SHA-256 hashes, we just roundtrip
SHA-1 for existing signatures.
Anyhow, please don't misuse this bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
--- Comment #24 from stavrosss ---
Miklos
I checked my signed libreoffice *.odt and it says
PKCS #1 SHA-1 With RSA Encryption
So it is not SHA-256.
How come there is the issue with apacheOO ?
"AOO has some ancient libxmlsec, so you
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
--- Comment #23 from Miklos Vajna ---
LO asks for the algo of the signing certificate, we handle RSA and ECDSA there.
Then we create a signature using the same algo, we don't really have an other
choice I think.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
--- Comment #22 from stavrosss ---
@Miklos Vajna
I use safenet etoken 5100 and SafeNet Authentication Client
Who decides for the crypto algorithm, is it Libreoffice of the Safenet Client?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
--- Comment #21 from Miklos Vajna ---
AOO has some ancient libxmlsec, so you need to use crypto algos which are
considered unsafe today to please it. If you create a new signature in LO,
you'll get SHA-256 for hashing, but AOO only support
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
--- Comment #20 from stavrosss ---
There is some nastiness going on here and I really hate it.
"JL: OpenOffice.org implements its own certificate verification routine.
-+ The goal is to separate validation of the signature
-+
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
Miklos Vajna changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #19 from Mikl
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
--- Comment #18 from NISZ LibreOffice Team ---
Also a debug build gives this console output when trying to sign a document:
warn:xmlsecurity.xmlsec:17676:14848:xmlsecurity/source/xmlsec/errorcallback.cxx:52:
..\src\xmldsig.c:793: xmlSecDS
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected, bisected,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
NISZ LibreOffice Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kelem...@ubuntu.com,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
--- Comment #16 from stavrosss ---
Issue exists as described by Martin
Windows 8.1 pro x64
Libreoffice 6.3
In the older version Loffice 6.1.6.3
the digital signature is working.
However for that version another bug exists
https://bugs
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eld...@hotmail.com
--- Comment #15 fro
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
--- Comment #14 from Martin ---
Digital signature is not working in 64 bit LibreOffice 6.2.x and 6.3 for
Windows 10 x64.
Behaviour is similary as described by Oliver, but i was using a hardware
digital signature (eToken):
1)The "Digital
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
Klibre changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WORKSFORME |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
--- Comment #12 from Jesus Jimenez ---
Digital signing doesn't work in 64 bit LibreOffice 6.0.6.2. Behaviour is as
described by Oliver.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
--- Comment #10 from Cor Nouws ---
(In reply to Samuel Mehrbrodt (CIB) from comment #8)
> LibreOffice 5.2 is EOL now.
>
> Does the bug still exist in 5.3 or 5.4?
I can use digital signatures on Windows 10 64 bits with LibreOffice 5.4.0.3
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ft...@telfort.nl
--- Comment #9 from B
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
Samuel Mehrbrodt (CIB) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #8
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
Samuel Mehrbrodt (CIB) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||bibisectRequest
--
You
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
Samuel Mehrbrodt (CIB) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s.mehrbr...@gmail.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94903
yanjing...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Digital Signatures are not |Digital Signatures are not
47 matches
Mail list logo