Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] RFC Operation Spamzilla (resent to include original -dev list post)

2011-12-23 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi all, On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 10:56:08PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Done. Next step would be removing all the "CONFIRMED", "UNCONFIRMED" cruft in > Whiteboard Status ... Also done. Please refrain from using Keyword "NEEDINFO" and Whiteboard Status "CONFIRMED", "infoprovider:" and "UNCONF

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] RFC Operation Spamzilla (resent to include original -dev list post)

2011-12-23 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 01:32:25PM +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > Yes, actually I want to use a query like that. Up to now I used the one at: > > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport_Details#Whiteboard > > but I will go with the one from the BugTriage page now. > > > And - may be yo

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Remark wrt the bug-hunt session

2011-12-23 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Cor, all I'm sorry to say that I will not be available for the Bug Hunting session. I will be on extremely limited (if any) internet connection starting from today. I know I'm still a newbie but it's one pair of (inexperienced) hands less. > Our announcement gets pretty some attention, so we m

[Libreoffice-qa] Remark wrt the bug-hunt session

2011-12-23 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Rainer, *, Our announcement gets pretty some attention, so we may hope that lots of people will find their way to our IRC channel and BugZilla :-) What I was thinking of: there might be some things possible to help people that are here for the first time, to come back more often for testi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] RFC Operation Spamzilla (resent to include original -dev list post)

2011-12-23 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Rainer, On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 08:34:12AM +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > of course I see the problem, but I have absolutely no problem with > that fact, because I use a query basing on my experience. Yes, but having to rely on somebody elses experience is a big barrier to newcomers and we s

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] RFC Operation Spamzilla

2011-12-23 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi Rainer, On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 08:34:12AM +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > of course I see the problem, but I have absolutely no problem with > that fact, because I use a query basing on my experience. Yes, but having to rely on somebody elses experience is a big barrier to newcomers and we s

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] (no subject)

2011-12-23 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Le 23/12/11 08:58, John Notminsk a écrit : Hi John, > PS Consider a phone app to read .odt files. None exist ("File App" works > poorly at best). You might even make some money. > John There are already several for Android : - IBM Lotus Symphony Viewer - Mobile Document Viewer (Free) - Mobil

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] RFC Operation Spamzilla

2011-12-23 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Hi Bjoern, Le 23/12/11 08:34, Rainer Bielefeld a écrit : >> So here is my proposal: I want to batch change all those old >> unconfirmed bugs >> (without the now obsolete CONFIRMED in whiteboard status) to state >> NEEDINFO. My issue with that is that I appear to be subscribed by default to all n

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] RFC Operation Spamzilla

2011-12-23 Thread Alexander Thurgood
Hi Rainer, Le 23/12/11 08:34, Rainer Bielefeld a écrit : > If you want to do the bulk change, you should avoid to change hundreds > of "Really NEW" old bugs to NEEDINFO. > > I recommend only to modify bugs what are NEW and fulfill some > additional criteria (no user with QA-Experience is involve

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] (no subject)

2011-12-23 Thread Petr Mladek
John Notminsk píše v Čt 22. 12. 2011 v 23:58 -0800: > Thanks for your response. > I sent this in response to your press release of a bug day (which is where I > got the address). > > Note: > #1, 2, 3c occur 100% of the time Sounds promising. > #3a occurs ~80%, esp if the changes are more extens

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] (no subject)

2011-12-23 Thread John Notminsk
Thanks for your response. I sent this in response to your press release of a bug day (which is where I got the address). Note: #1, 2, 3c occur 100% of the time #3a occurs ~80%, esp if the changes are more extensive #3b occurs ~50% of time. Again have occurred for years on mult OS (XP/Linux) both