Hi,
you can find a summery from my point of view concerning QA related
discussion of the Engineering Steering Committee on
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/RBd/TSC_Call_Minutes
Best regards
Rainer
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail
My plain opinion about this: all developers should focus on fixing
regressions. And then on fixing bugs. And only after that in adding new
features/bugs.
Simply put: Regressions + Bugs cause to LOOSE existing users.
If someone upgrades to get rid of a bug that was present in his current
install
Op 27-01-12 16:17, Cor Nouws schreef:
Hi Nino,
Nino Novak wrote (27-01-12 15:09)
Personally I have the impression / concern that Quality is getting one of the
main challenges of LibreOffice as it seems to decrease more and more
I disagree with you.
And it's not an answer to my serious
Hi Rainer, all
Rainer Bielefeld-2 wrote
If we could do more intensive Master testing to find regressions very soon
after they appeared might ease that.
Activity concerning regression fixing increased during last year, and in
2012 currently we also have approximately 1 regression fix
Pedro schrieb:
More intensive testing is not the problem. Your TSC summary shows there are
still 80 regressions. At a rate of 1 fix per day that would take over 2.5
months.
Hi,
I am afraid that is too optimistic; Oct-Dec 2011 115 regressions have
been fixed, but during the same time 64 new
