I also replied to this off list. We are consistent and that's good ;)
Ultimately, we're not going to change our workflow. It's up to a user to
report with clear steps and a simple test document - else it's just a
waste of our time. Glad we all think alike :-D
Best,
Joel
On 07/14/2014 05:38 PM, J
Hi All,
I normally update my daily builds of 4.2, 4.3 and master once a week,
but unfortunately they havent been updated since the 8th or 9th for
Linux-rpm_deb-x86@45-TDF. Any help would be appreciated.
--
Regards,
Jay Philips
___
List Name: Libreoffic
Hi All,
I have found that asking for a document is the best way to get closest
to what the user is experiencing and what they are writing the bug for.
If they report the bug on windows, i load up windows to confirm it and
then also check if its on linux as well. Sometimes the steps to
reproduce ar
Hi!
>From my experience asking for an example file is the best way to triage for
following reasons:
- saves time - you can download the attachment and check it in different
builds right away - important with current backlog in Unconfirmed bugs
- reproducible case - sometimes when you follow the STR
Hi Marc,
Thanks for looking into it, but unfortunately you need to check the
print dialog to confirm it. :)
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 07/14/2014 05:51 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> Le 2014-07-13 23:08, Jay Philips a écrit :
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Users trying to print '#10 envelope' on any printer
Hi,
just to quickly expand on that:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 02:35:43PM +0200, Sophie wrote:
> > I believe it is always possible for the checkers to trust the
> > "reporters" and follow the "steps to reproduce" on their own material
> > first; if they can't do that, they probably should a
Hi Jay,
Le 2014-07-13 23:08, Jay Philips a écrit :
Hi All,
Users trying to print '#10 envelope' on any printer (Brother [77277],
Epson [75449], Canon [52926], etc [64966]) are having problems, so if
anybody can test this out, we can close these 4 bugs. The user in bug
77277 has stated that it w
Hi Miklos,
I mis-wrote in my last email, as i only do writer bug triaging, so
luckily ww8 hasnt been used to mislead anyone. :)
Regards,
Jay Philips
On 07/14/2014 12:44 PM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 01:58:56AM +0400, Jay Philips
> wrote:
>> I have been using ww8 to cover al
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 6:48 AM, K-J LibreOffice wrote:
> Hi Robinson,
> Am 14.07.2014 09:05, schrieb Robinson Tryon:
>> We have a Redmine project for 'QA' now...
>
> Can't see a project "QA" in Redmine:
> https://redmine.documentfoundation.org/projects
Should be fixed -- I had to make the projec
Le 14/07/2014 09:10, jean-christophe manciot a écrit :
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've been aware of the following situation for a long time in the "bug
> report forum", but I thought it would improve over time. Since it
> hasn't changed at all, I feel I have to blow the whistle on this.
>
> As I have
Hi Robinson,
Am 14.07.2014 09:05, schrieb Robinson Tryon:
[...]
We have a Redmine project for 'QA' now, so all of you slackers who
have been doing useless things like triaging bugs and updating the
wiki should take a quick moment to run over and create an account so I
can assign you TODO items
Hi all,
I recently pushed a few canges that try to unwind one of the smaller Gordian
Knots in Writer(*), to get rid of a horrible old implementation that nobody
dared to touch. The new implementation isnt fancy at all (yet), but at least
should
pave the way for further cleaning up the code, which
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 01:58:56AM +0400, Jay Philips
wrote:
> I have been using ww8 to cover all the doc/xls/etc. as i saw Stahl use
> it in one of his comments. I saw Joren using odf, so i've been using
> that sometimes. I dont see much benefit in breaking odf down into
> individual odf extensi
If we're touching the subject - why not use 'DOCX' as a whiteboard keyword ?
That would be very helpful to search for duplicates before filing new bugs.
(or is this already an existing keyword?)
On Sun, Jul 13, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Joel Madero wrote:
> Hey Jay,
> On 07/12/2014 04:49 PM, Jay Philips
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 1:06 AM, Tommy wrote:
> hi there
> I wonder if it's possible to have this bugzilla weekly stat page on a
> monthly or yearly basis
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/page.cgi?id=weekly-bug-summary.html
>
> is there any place I can tweak the time period which is actually limited
On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen
wrote:
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 07:58:28PM +0400, Jay Philips wrote:
>> and derivatives, that we have a stable ppa that users who wish to stay
>> on stable dont have to modify when a new stables comes out.
>
> Yes, Im considering that...
Bjoern
Hi all,
It's just a couple of days until our next marvelous, majestic,
wonderful, and exciting QA Meeting. The Agenda and the Handy-dandy
"what-time-is-the-meeting-in-my-time-zone?" link may both be found
here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2014/July_16
We have a Redmine project
17 matches
Mail list logo
