On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 02:37 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:40:40PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
And with this I see a lot of processes running parallel till the end. This
suggests to me that the stuff is quite parallelized -- however none of the
testing
Le 29/05/2015 04:07, Joel Madero a écrit :
Hi Joel,
What I think would be minimum (and can be done) is:
Confirm each crash on 5.0;
_Ensure_ that each has easy steps;
For the most straight forward ones that have easy steps we can just mark
them as critical + highest - signaling that they
Hi,
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:02:56AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
It is clearly great to run 'make check' before pushing (just fixing
some results from CI) - however, to assume that everyone has a 32 core
machine (I have 4 not-so-strong cores) 32/4 * 2m - 16m (not so far from
15
Hi,
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 02:37:31AM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
... brings 'make check' down to 2m6s on big Bertha. For comparison:
[...]
that is, just relinking (most) LibreOffice libs takes 2m26s on that machine
without symbols (assume more than 10 minutes with symbols). Given this
please add it to the version dropdown menu
Tommy
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems?
