Hi all,
So there will be a QA irc meeting tomorrow at 13:00 UTC. Robinson will
you chair it? In case you're not available, let me know, I would jump in.
Also, I would like to discuss a more convenient time for the meeting.
What would be the best time for the group? speaking in UTC would it be
AM
Hi Alex,
> I've always had a problem with bulk email bug reminders, and this has
> definitely pushed my patience over my limit - for me, it only makes
> sense if one understands the context behind the number of bugs reported
> and tailors the reminder policy accordingly. I accept that we may not
Hi Sophie, all
sophi wrote
> So there will be a QA irc meeting tomorrow at 13:00 UTC. Robinson will
> you chair it? In case you're not available, let me know, I would jump in.
> Also, I would like to discuss a more convenient time for the meeting.
> What would be the best time for the group?
Morning all,
So, I see that for some reason which is yet unclear to me, there is
currently a blitz on Base bugs from the QA reminder bot. Quite why, I
must confess to not understanding. What is the rationale that predicts
why it should be likely that any of these bugs have been fixed or have
gone
Hi Alex,
my two cents.
It is IHMO correct (all 6 months) to check if bugreports are actual.
The problem is that only one (and occasionally two) devs actually is/are
working on the code. But this not the problem of QA.
Why are you confess? The procedure of QA is another problem than the
* Present: Heiko, Kendy, Samuel
* UI changes integrated since the last meeting:
+ resource menus & readonly improvements (Maxim)
+ new saving behavior + indication (Maxim)
+ "show draw functions" button for Draw & Impress (Gulsah)
+ Comments on design blog (Heiko)
+
Hi Alex,
I understand you und I agree with you in nearly all points.
Am 19.01.2016 um 15:54 schrieb Alexander Thurgood:
I've always had a problem with bulk email bug reminders
+
... receiving 200 or so emails in the process
IMO we have to accept this.
The solution may be a special way für
Le 19/01/2016 14:01, Jochen Schiffers a écrit :
Hi Jochen,
> It is IHMO correct (all 6 months) to check if bugreports are actual.
> The problem is that only one (and occasionally two) devs actually is/are
> working on the code. But this not the problem of QA.
I never said it was the problem of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hy Alex,
>
> I never said it was the problem of QA that only 2 devs work on the
> Base code. My issue is with what appears to have been targeting a
> module for which the number of open bugs will necessarily not have
> diminished a great deal since
