Re: [Libreoffice-qa] QA and QA Analyst - from Timur

Hello Florian and others Let me point out what matters. It's not that simple that I'm "one of many applicants that's unhappy because a single one is selected". It's that I was alrady doing the majority of items for years prior to selection topping in QA reports and still someone else was chosen

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ESC meeting agenda - Adding topic: Broken release process when fresh become still and when still become EOL'ed

On Thursday, January 28, 2021, Florian Effenberger < flo...@documentfoundation.org> wrote: > > William Gathoye (LibreOffice) wrote on 27.01.21 at 18:22: > >> Right now: 6.4 is EOL'ed[4] but it is still advertised on the website while the update service is redirecting users of 6.4 to the 7.0

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Removal of Spam Account

It's done already. It's manual and tedious now. I always wonder if it takes a script or new Bugzilla version to have a single button for BZ admins. And some more, like "see all reports by that commenter", "see all commits by that dev". Buovjaga, you follow BZ, is there any chance ? Regards On

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Weekly QA Report (W49-2018)

Hello Nice reports. I hope you'll prepare yearly report for 2018 including also an evolution for total number of open bugs and closed bugs. QA blog page is narrow, it should be broadened. At least to the width of blog.documentfoundation.org. Best wishes in 2019. Timur

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Call for help: Untouched bugs pinged more than once

Hi Bug 57418 is on the list because last 3 messages were from qa-ad...@libreoffice.org. So not some malware, simply bugs without feedback. On 8/14/17, Xisco Fauli wrote: > Hello, > > Today I modified this script [1] to check those bugs pinged more than > once with

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Meta bug telegram group

Hello all I'm confused with all those Meta bugs. Looks like there are so many of them that I wonder how that can help. I wasn't here on the list so I don't know if that's explained somewhere. In my view, we don't need them like that, and similar bugs can be found by search. Meta should gather

[Libreoffice-qa] LO 3.7 enhancements

influence some decisions? Are they still relevant? There should be some explanation. Regards Timur Gadzo ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Fwd: [tdf-announce] The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6 with a wealth of new features and improvements

On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 15:27 +0200, Timur Gadzo wrote: I find that there should be an explanation in MAB 3.6. when exactly will fixes for bugs resolved in LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs be included in LO 3.6. Right; that's not clear. Personally I prefer a rather shorter, more

[Libreoffice-qa] Fwd: [tdf-announce] The Document Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6 with a wealth of new features and improvements

Foundation announces LibreOffice 3.6 .. says More conservative users should stick with LibreOffice 3.5.. It should be explained until when. Is it at some specific version, or when a line reaches Recommended part of 3.6 at http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:LibOReleaseLifecycle.png? Regards Timur