Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.1.2 RC3 test builds available

2013-10-11 Thread bjoern
On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 05:40:19PM -0700, Pedro wrote: The discussion referred to Master builds. Not only for Windows but according to Thomas also for Debian. http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@39/ and bibisect is daily master and works on debian. As for the tone of your

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.1.2 RC3 test builds available

2013-10-11 Thread Thomas Hackert
Good morning Bjoern, *, On Freitag, 11. Oktober 2013 08:57 bjoern wrote: On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 05:40:19PM -0700, Pedro wrote: The discussion referred to Master builds. Not only for Windows but according to Thomas also for Debian. http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/Win-x86@39/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.1.2 RC3 test builds available

2013-10-10 Thread bjoern
Hi, On Sun, Oct 06, 2013 at 02:20:49PM +0200, bjoern wrote: Not at all, since the builds themselves are provided by volunteers. Of course, you are invited to maintain a tinderbox providing daily builds in a more reliable fashion (or help out with one of the existing ones). Actually that would

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.1.2 RC3 test builds available

2013-10-10 Thread Pedro
Hi Björn Thank you for the update. Bjoern Michaelsen wrote FWIW, there are now current builds by Win-x86_9-Voreppe on http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/libreoffice-4-1/ and a reasonably recent bibisect at http://people.canonical.com/~j-lallement/libreoffice/binrepo/ and my

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.1.2 RC3 test builds available

2013-10-07 Thread Pedro
Hi Björn Bjoern Michaelsen wrote Not at all, since the builds themselves are provided by volunteers. Of course, you are invited to maintain a tinderbox providing daily builds in a more reliable fashion (or help out with one of the existing ones). Actually that would be most welcome! As

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.1.2 RC3 test builds available

2013-10-07 Thread bjoern
Hi, On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 06:22:54AM -0700, Pedro wrote: As you know, I'm not a developer. Getting a tinderbox to work in a more reliable fashion requires developer knowledge. No, getting a tinderbox to build does not require any voodoo skills -- and skills can be learned and sharpened. I

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.1.2 RC3 test builds available

2013-10-06 Thread bjoern
Hi, On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 08:43:46AM -0700, Pedro wrote: Unfortunately TDF's position is there is no official guarantee that daily builds for some specific platform and configuration will continuously be built and uploaded Which is a curious position, ... Not at all, since the builds

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.1.2 RC3 test builds available

2013-10-05 Thread Pedro
Web Page Wizard doesn't work under Windows XP using version 4.1.2.3 both installed and portable. It does work on LO 4.0.5 so it seems to be a regression. It doesn't work on LO 4.2.0 Alpha (dated 2031-10-04 from TB 39) so the bug seems to be in the Master branch as well. Can anyone provide more

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.1.2 RC3 test builds available

2013-10-05 Thread Thomas Hackert
Hello Pedro, *, On Samstag, 5. Oktober 2013 15:58 Pedro wrote: Web Page Wizard doesn't work under Windows XP using version 4.1.2.3 both installed and portable. what do you mean with doesn't work? It does not start, you cannot use the wizard, or something completely different? It does work on

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.1.2 RC3 test builds available

2013-10-05 Thread Pedro
Hi Thomas Thank you for your fast answer and for testing. Thomas Hackert wrote Web Page Wizard doesn't work under Windows XP using version 4.1.2.3 both installed and portable. what do you mean with doesn't work? It does not start, you cannot use the wizard, or something completely

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 4.1.2 RC3 test builds available

2013-10-02 Thread Pedro
Major regression found in 4.1.2.3 (I haven't teste 4.1.2.1 or 4.1.2.2 but it is a regression from 4.1.1.2) Reported here https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70029 -- View this message in context: