Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [QA] Bug Tracker Feature Request

2014-03-18 Thread Joel Madero
On 03/18/2014 12:02 PM, bfoman wrote: > jmadero wrote >> The € 3000 is for the migration itself not for administering it once it >> is setup. > Hi! > OMG. I should have clarified that ;) It's been "allocated" for that but that's just in case it's needed not already spent ;) > Anyway who will admi

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [QA] Bug Tracker Feature Request

2014-03-18 Thread bfoman
Bugzilla Best regards. P.S. The next version of Bugzilla (5.0), with its new features, is already testable at https://landfill.bugzilla.org/bugzilla-tip/. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-QA-Bug-Tracker-Feature-Request-tp4101889p4102067.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [QA] Bug Tracker Feature Request

2014-03-18 Thread Joel Madero
Hi there, > Hi! > Seeing is believing... :) Well good news is we got our test VM up yesterday - so there is at least a baby step forward ;) > I have a question regarding € 3000 budget for own > Bugzilla - is it for hardware or having a Bugzilla perl coder/administrator > freelance contract? Some

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [QA] Bug Tracker Feature Request

2014-03-18 Thread bfoman
or everyone but QA, DEVs and experienced bug triagers. Best regards. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-QA-Bug-Tracker-Feature-Request-tp4101889p4102060.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _

[Libreoffice-qa] [QA] Bug Tracker Feature Request

2014-03-17 Thread Joel Madero
Hi All, So we're getting really into the planning stages of our own instance of bugzilla. That being said we are compiling a list of requests that could improve how users/devs/and QA interact with it. If you have any ideas feel free to add: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Projects/Ideas/Sel