Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ESC / Rome discussion ...

Hi, On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 02:06:07PM +0200, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > So I like the approach in the line of "let's do it for new files + > subset of those that don't change too much first, and see in ~1/2 year > again if we are ready for a further step" (or that's how I understood > Miklos' plan

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ESC / Rome discussion ...

Hi Jan, Jan Iversen píše v Út 24. 10. 2017 v 11:08 +0200: > However, I do not like the idea that we have different styles > depending on the creation date / major modification date of the file. > It would be so much easier to reformat the lot in one commit and have > it behind us !! > > Reformat

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] ESC / Rome discussion ...

Hi, On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 04:46:20PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > Miklos‘ (Heretical) style plan > ... > Should Miklos come up with a prototype ? > Yes. It's up at . Regards, Miklos signature.asc Description: Digital signatur

[Libreoffice-qa] ESC / Rome discussion ...

Rather free-form, and not entirely serious: Miklos‘ (Heretical) style plan Encouraging style consistency – with tooling. Re-formatting the whole code-base is rather controversial Compromise: build a black-list of all existing code, for new code enforce existing style