Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Updater improvements

2013-12-08 Thread Robinson Tryon
Cloph - Thoughts? On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:22 AM, Robinson Tryon wrote: > Hi all, > > We've chatted a bit about some of the shortcomings of the updater > lately, and I've come up with a couple of suggestions for improving > not only the updater, but parts of our build system and bug tracker as >

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Updater improvements

2013-12-08 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Rob Snelders wrote: > Hi, > > Would it be an idea to use mirrorbrain for this? > That has already the supported versions. We could patch it so it can give us > the files in JSON/XML-format rather then create our own little program for > this. The downside is that m

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Updater improvements

2013-12-08 Thread Rob Snelders
Hi, Would it be an idea to use mirrorbrain for this? That has already the supported versions. We could patch it so it can give us the files in JSON/XML-format rather then create our own little program for this. The downside is that mirrorbrain hasn't had a release in 1,5 years. So I don't know

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Updater improvements

2013-12-06 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 5:02 AM, Rob Snelders wrote: >> >> So to sum up, my suggestion is that we store version information in a >> database such that it can be >> - Updated by the official build/upload process >> - Updated by the person(s) who picks the 'stable' build >> - Queried by the BSA >> -

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Updater improvements

2013-12-06 Thread Rob Snelders
So to sum up, my suggestion is that we store version information in a database such that it can be - Updated by the official build/upload process - Updated by the person(s) who picks the 'stable' build - Queried by the BSA - Queried by various websites that need the information Did I forget anyt

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Updater improvements

2013-12-06 Thread Thomas Hackert
Hello Robinson, *, On Freitag, 6. Dezember 2013 09:49 Robinson Tryon wrote: > On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Thomas Hackert > wrote: >>> Did I forget anything? >> >> I do not know, but as a user, who prefers to use bugzilla >> directly instead of BSA ... ;) What about the version field in >> bugz

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Updater improvements

2013-12-06 Thread Robinson Tryon
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:40 AM, Thomas Hackert wrote: >> Did I forget anything? > > I do not know, but as a user, who prefers to use bugzilla directly > instead of BSA ... ;) What about the version field in bugzilla? > Would it be possible to add/remove versions there too, if needed? > Or would th

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Updater improvements

2013-12-06 Thread Thomas Hackert
Hello Robinson, *, On Freitag, 6. Dezember 2013 09:22 Robinson Tryon wrote: > We've chatted a bit about some of the shortcomings of the updater > lately, and I've come up with a couple of suggestions for > improving not only the updater, but parts of our build system and > bug tracker as well. > S

[Libreoffice-qa] Updater improvements

2013-12-06 Thread Robinson Tryon
Hi all, We've chatted a bit about some of the shortcomings of the updater lately, and I've come up with a couple of suggestions for improving not only the updater, but parts of our build system and bug tracker as well. 1) Problem: It's hard to add new build hashes to the updater The updater mixe