Re: [Libreoffice-qa] make check / dbgutil performance ...

2015-06-05 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi, On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 02:27:44PM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > Exactly the opposite here. I do paid work on my desktop machine(s), and > just light mostly unpaid (or at least not paid by customers) hacking at > hackfests or conferences (well, the LO one) on my laptop. Well, we have these aw

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] make check / dbgutil performance ...

2015-06-05 Thread Tor Lillqvist
> my gut feeling is that the 'has to compile on the notebook that > I take aorund the world'-requirement is more one from sponsored > developers, while > our volunteer contributors often do their compiles at home on a desktop > machine ... > Exactly the opposite here. I do paid work on my desktop

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] make check / dbgutil performance ...

2015-06-05 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi, On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 11:56:09AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > Without dbgutil we get: > > real 12m45.145s > user 28m47.321s > sys 2m34.849s > > Which is better, but still not 3x minutes. On a slow machine, things are slow. How does it compare to just relinking LibreOffice

[Libreoffice-qa] make check / dbgutil performance ...

2015-06-05 Thread Michael Meeks
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 13:11 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:02:56AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > > It is clearly great to run 'make check' before pushing (just fixing > > some results from CI) - however, to assume that everyone has a 32 core > > machine (I have 4