Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Call for LO-3.5.0-beta1 pre-tag testing

Petr Mladek schrieb: could you please do some testing with the last daily builds from the libreoffice-3-5 branch? See below where to get them. Hi, I have been testing for some hours doing my normal daily work without bigger bad surprises. So it seems we are on a good way for Beta 1,

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] End of the line for 3.3 family and regressions

Hello Pedro, all, This maybe a bit off topic, but IMHO we have some general cases, for example: * the bug is explicitly fixed in next 3.4/3.5 release, but not in reporter's version * the bug disappeared in next 3.4/3.5 release, without explicit fix * the bug that isn't fixed yet since 3.3 release,

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] End of the line for 3.3 family and regressions

Hi Korrawit, all > So, what should we do to each group of bugs? Anyway, I'm not sure > whether there are how many bugs in each group, or even there is any > bug in some group. Maybe we need separate discussion? This isn't simply a matter of checking and reporting bugs. It involves the Quality of

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] End of the line for 3.3 family and regressions

Pedro Lino schrieb: Looking at the Release Plan chart Pedro Lino schrieb: Hi, I am just preparing some information concerning such regression problems we will discuss during next TSC call on Thursday before I publish it. The current results are completely in accordance with Pedro's argume

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] Call for LO-3.5.0-beta1 pre-tag testing

Cor Nouws wrote (09-12-11 22:44) Linux (still not uploaded): will have to wait for those though ;-) Was able to install today on Ubuntu 32 bits and did some simple things (among which 2400+ record mail merge - which goes fine&fast). Saw some things that are not ok, but not yet items that ar

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] End of the line for 3.3 family and regressions

Hi Pedro, *, Pedro Lino wrote (10-12-11 12:46) So, what should we do to each group of bugs? Anyway, I'm not sure whether there are how many bugs in each group, or even there is any bug in some group. Maybe we need separate discussion? It is already for some time now, that there is need for mo

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] End of the line for 3.3 family and regressions

Hi Pedro, On Fri, 2011-12-09 at 20:34 +, Pedro Lino wrote: > E.g. A bug fix such as this > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42958 > needs to be "cherry picked" to the 3.4 branch Seems that Eike picked this to -3-4 shortly after you mentioned it ;-) of course, if there are

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] End of the line for 3.3 family and regressions

Hi Michael >        Seems that Eike picked this to -3-4 shortly after you mentioned it ;-) > of course, if there are more annoying, but trivial / obvious fixes we > need to get into 3.4.5 it'd be great to know ASAP - the freeze for 3.4.5 > RC1 is early next week, and I'd really like not to see ~an

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [Libreoffice] Call for LO-3.5.0-beta1 pre-tag testing

On 10/12/11 07:34, Petr Mladek wrote: The 64-bit build for few localizations is being uploaded at http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/Linux_x86_64_Release_Configuration/libreoffice-3-5/ It is built the same way like the 32-bit build, see above. We started the regular tinderbox again. Please