Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] Referencing bugs in commits
Hey, 2012/2/17 Lionel Elie Mamane : > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:16:33PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > >> whenever you are committing / pushing to git, and you >> reference the bugs.freedesktop.org bug in the commit message, it will >> automatically appear as a comment in the bug :-) > > It seems not to happen this morning. In general, after how much time > after commit should we get worried and report it? > This one was my mistake. It is quite difficult to test this scricpt so that sometimes after a change or a new situation it does not update the bug (please watch next week with pushing bugs to 3-5 and 3-5-1). If you see a commit with a bug number announced by CIA bot and the script did not update the bug drop Kendy and me a short note. Regards, Markus ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] Referencing bugs in commits
Hi Lionel, Lionel Elie Mamane píše v Pá 17. 02. 2012 v 09:23 +0100: > > whenever you are committing / pushing to git, and you > > reference the bugs.freedesktop.org bug in the commit message, it will > > automatically appear as a comment in the bug :-) > > It seems not to happen this morning. In general, after how much time > after commit should we get worried and report it? fdo seems to have some problems (terribly slow today), and it has been timing out. Generally, the comments should appear at the same time the CIAbot reports appear on IRC. > That's misleading. See e.g. > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45748#c9 > and > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=66cf06ebdd4eeb95e801de114af06b49119fc7fe&g=libreoffice-3-5 > Committed by Tor, but authored by Cédric. The message in the bug says > "Cédric committed". I've now changed it to: - 8< - $author committed a patch related to this issue. It has been pushed to "$branch": ... etc., as before ... - 8< - Any further tweaks possible, if it is still confusing. Regards, Kendy ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Relase_Criteria wiki page change request
On Thursday 16 February 2012, Petr Mladek wrote: > Nino Novak píše v Čt 16. 02. 2012 v 02:01 +0100: > > [Transclusion] > > Sounds wonderful! I was not aware of such feature. oh, there are still many "unused wiki features" left ;-) > > For conveniance, I've attached a patch, hopefully it works ;-) > > I have done the changes. I hope that correctly ;-) Yepp, thanks, works fine :-) > Anyway, feel free to do such changes yourself. If it works as you say, > it is just a great improvement. There must have been a (cache?) problem with exactly this page as I was not allowed to edit it (always getting the "browse source" response only, telling me that my email has not been verified yet). Now I tried again and it finally worked :-) Nino ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] Referencing bugs in commits
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 04:16:33PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote: > whenever you are committing / pushing to git, and you > reference the bugs.freedesktop.org bug in the commit message, it will > automatically appear as a comment in the bug :-) It seems not to happen this morning. In general, after how much time after commit should we get worried and report it? > - 8< - > fdo#45748: Don't use empty pages for computing the page break position > - 8< - > It will result in the following comment in bugzilla: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45748#c7 It says: $AUTHOR commited a patch related to this issue to "$BRANCH" That's misleading. See e.g. https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45748#c9 and http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=66cf06ebdd4eeb95e801de114af06b49119fc7fe&g=libreoffice-3-5 Committed by Tor, but authored by Cédric. The message in the bug says "Cédric committed". I would suggest one of: A patch by $AUTHOR related to this issue was committed to "$BRANCH" (should it be "has been committed" maybe?) or $COMMITTER committed a patch by $AUTHOR related to this issue to "$BRANCH" or $AUTHOR's patch related to this issue was/has been committed to "$BRANCH" -- Lionel ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/