* Present:
+ Eike, Astron, Markus, Rainer, Michael, Kendy, Bjoern,
Michael Stahl, Caolan, David, Cedric, Andras, Petr,
Lionel
* Completed Action Items
+ icons: poke Mango authors (Michael)
+ revert 3.6 to opaque background on Win7 (Kendy)
* Pending
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 08:25:40PM +0200, Florian Reisinger wrote:
the next LibreOffice QA call is on 2012-06-28 14:00 UTC. See prototype agenda
below.
Hopefully it should be 2012-06-29??
Yes, sorry.
Best,
Bjoern
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa
- Forwarded message from Florian Reisinger reisi...@gmail.com -
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 20:25:40 +0200
From: Florian Reisinger reisi...@gmail.com
To: Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com
Subject: Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibreOffice QA Call 2012-06-28
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0
On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 09:56 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
+ (Caolan) 'C' locale is a 'no idea what people want' locale
I mean that a huge amount of people use the en_US locale as their
default I want everything in English even though I'm not in the US
locale[1] so that its probably
On 2012-06-29 14:47, Caolán McNamara wrote:
I looked through some of these, some patches are just experimental
stuff or debugging patches or obsolete stuff.
Maybe we should have some way of marking bugs in in-progress or
experimental ?
Maybe just push bugs that have incomplete patches into
Hi Cor
Le 2012-06-27 08:02, Cor Nouws a écrit :
Hi all,
Rainer Bielefeld wrote (26-06-12 20:13)
Michael Meeks schrieb:
If it gets us more testing of 3.6 - it sounds like an excellent
idea to
I also believe it would be great do do some final spurt for 3.6.
[..]
But may be I will join for a
Hi.
In regards to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51352#c3
I think that imported bugs which are in RESOLVED FIXED state should get some
kind of notification by a triagger.
LO devs, with the current backlog, should not waste time for bugs, which
are already fixed in the other codebase.
Hi!
Beside of the QA confcall:
Every of this should be closed with an automatic message...
This message should contain a long string like rf4g55gb48h4
So that we can search that string and close that:
On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 14:51 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
On 2012-06-29 14:47, Caolán McNamara wrote:
I looked through some of these, some patches are just experimental
stuff or debugging patches or obsolete stuff.
Maybe we should have some way of marking bugs in in-progress or
Hi Marc,
Marc Paré wrote (29-06-12 16:12)
Just as a suggestion for future bug hunting and other events.
Could you please check the calendar of events before planning any
events? This will help avoid any conflicts with any other events that
show on the calendar.
You're right, thanks for
Hi,
please find the minutes of the QA call below. Additions and corrections most
welcome.
attending: Cor, Florian, Petr, Rainer, Bjoern
pending action items:
- write update scenario testcase in Litmus/MozTrap (Kendy)
- merge 3.5 and 3.6 in one big bibisect repo (Bjoern)
- recheck and
I try not to bug devs over these kinds of things but I came across one of
these enhancement requests that I wanted to see what everyone thought.
The request is to get IMPORT working for the software program MINDVIEW.
I feel like we should close it as WONTFIX. Reasons:
1. The software isn't free
Hi All,
Friendly discussion about if we can commit to putting a minimum version
or a since on our API documentation. We've had a user put in a bug report
(I closed as not a bug but thought it was valid anyways) that we don't
consistently -- or more accurately, rarely ever -- put a minimum version
On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 23:57 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
mostly though reset attachment flags
what's your route here ? changing to non-patch/plain-text the
experimental/dead stuff ?
C.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
I am really hesitant to support just having so many bugs floating around
like this. I think that marking as RESOLVED - WONTFIX enables devs to look
at these if they are ever inclined to do so but makes it clear to the users
that we won't be doing this (almost guaranteed). I think if we just keep
Hi,
On 2012-06-29 at 23:57 +0200, Michael Stahl wrote:
* Pending Action Items
+ [pending] merge the new pretty templates in place of the old ugly
ones (Michael S)
hmm... how come the minutes say i am merging templates?
I believe it was Astron who volunteered (and probably Michael
Hi all,
hmm... how come the minutes say i am merging templates? i consider it
Apparently, we sound alike..? Anyway, it was me who said that he'd try
to help out there.
Astron.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address:
One of my mein concerns is that we aren't keeping up with bug reports so we
may close a bug at eol without anyone from QA or any developer ever looking
at it. To me this seems unfair to the reporter.
On Jun 29, 2012 4:00 PM, Caolán McNamara caol...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 15:36
Macro Writing by non Developers should be made more easy
At present for example, it is difficult to know how to:
(1) create tool tips comments in one's own written macros,
(2) index all the macros and their functionality, to reduce duplication,
(3) create new icons more suited to a
19 matches
Mail list logo
