On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 2:35 AM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
One of my mein concerns is that we aren't keeping up with bug reports so we
may close a bug at eol without anyone from QA or any developer ever looking
at it. To me this seems unfair to the reporter.
It is a little
Hi Joel, *,
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 12:36 AM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
I am really hesitant to support just having so many bugs floating around
like this. I think that marking as RESOLVED - WONTFIX enables devs to look
at these if they are ever inclined to do s
But doesn't
On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 17:35 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
One of my mein concerns is that we aren't keeping up with bug reports
so we may close a bug at eol without anyone from QA or any developer
ever looking at it. To me this seems unfair to the reporter.
We could append a statement
Michael, not quite sure where you're talking about putting that statement.
Noel, agreed, but I think we can be better than that ;) My goal is and
continues to be to have all bug statuses correct by the end of the year and
then to never have a bug go UNCONFIRMED for more than a month (maybe 2)
I
Joel Madero schrieb:
We could put WONTFIX with a message to the reporter that states.
Hi all,
during the last QA call we decided to do a mass close for NEEDINFO bugs
without reaction for a too long time ( 1000). There simply is too much
time wasted by several people asking again and again
