Hi Pedro,
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 08:55 -0800, Pedro wrote:
> > So - datefuns works perfectly for me in master and in 4.0; 18 out of
> > 18.
>
> Really? I get 14 out of 18.
There must be some locale sensitivity in the sheet the; in en_US.UTF-8
locale it works fine for me; take a look:
Hi Markus
Markus Mohrhard wrote
>> I'm not sure I follow your logic here. There are major structural changes
>> needed so it's best not to touch it? Is it like a wasp's nest?
>
> It means that it is not as easy as you imagine it. All these large
> refactoring normally feel for a Calc developer l
Hi Michael
Michael Meeks-2 wrote
> There must be some locale sensitivity in the sheet the; in en_US.UTF-8
> locale it works fine for me; take a look:
>
> http://users.freedesktop.org/~michael/datefuns.png
>
> Which highlights some of the problems with building reliable tests I
Hi,
2013/2/26 Joel Madero
> Hm I have mixed feelings about these requirements.
>
Me too...
> I think that what it says is "this person prioritized the bug and did
> initial testing". Personally if you say that any person who adds their name
> to there has become indefinitely responsible fo
On Fri, 2013-03-01 at 03:20 -0800, Pedro wrote:
> > https://help.libreoffice.org/Calc/Recalculate
> >
> > With a hard-recalculate. So we know that that works and hasn't
> > regressed :-)
>
> Interesting. But then pressing F9 should result in 4 and changing
Notice the '-hard-' in
Dear Community,
The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the second release
candidate of our upcoming LibreOffice 4.0.1. This will be the first in
a series of frequent updates to our feature-packed 4.0 branch. Please
be aware that LibreOffice 4.0.1 RC2 is not ready for production use,
you sh
Joel Madero píše v Út 26. 02. 2013 v 12:23 -0800:
> Hm I have mixed feelings about these requirements. I think that what
> it says is "this person prioritized the bug and did initial testing".
> Personally if you say that any person who adds their name to there has
> become indefinitely responsible
> I would not enforce this but I would make it optional. By other words, I
> would take inspiration from the developers side where the "random" names
> in assigned fields just created false feeling that the developer was
> going to work on the bug soon.
>
> I would do it the following way:
>
> 1. I
Mirosław Zalewski píše v So 23. 02. 2013 v 23:57 +0100:
> On 22/02/2013 at 11:44, Petr Mladek wrote:
>
> > + at the end of the bugzilla assistant, see
> > https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/bug/
>
> By the way: It would be really useful, if bug assistant provided link to LO
> bugs search pa
