Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LO and Base diagram

Hello Michael, > When reading all the comments to this bug: It has beeen introduced since > the first version of LO 3.5.0.rc1 now we know that it is a MAB and we know since when we live with it. Is there any chance to fix it in the near future? best regards Andreas _

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] How to report Enhancement Requests for FDO infrastructure (Bugzilla)

Rainer Bielefeld schrieb: If I do not read concerns Hi, no concerns, so done CU Rainer ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change

[Libreoffice-qa] New Bugzilla Version warning

Hi, I see that the "Change to later Version Warning" Enhancement is under construction - great! I am planning to remove the Impress remote Versions from Bugzilla within next hours. I discussed that with Joel and consensus is that a) currently we do not need that, it's enough to handle that li

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LO and Base diagram

On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 10:25 +0200, Andreas Lartz wrote: > Hello Michael, > > > When reading all the comments to this bug: It has beeen introduced since > > the first version of LO 3.5.0.rc1 > > now we know that it is a MAB and we know since when we live with it. Is > there any chance to fix it i

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla administration info - Impress Remote Versions

Today I removed the Impress Remote Versions from Bugzilla. Proceeding until a final Solution for bug handling with LibO related tools: Like with Enhancements CU Rainer P.S.: In this thread I want to

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla administration info - Impress Remote Versions

On Thu, 2013-04-04 at 13:18 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > Today I removed the Impress Remote Versions from Bugzilla. Thanks for the link - make sense to me, though I was confused by the comment until I read the page. Good stuff, Michael. -- michael.me...@su

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla administration info - Impress Remote Versions

Michael Meeks schrieb: Thanks for the link - make sense to me, though I was confused by the comment until I read the page. Hi, if someone has an idea for a more intuitive wording instead of "(See in Summary)" please let me know here in the list, tat can be modified without causing

[Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla administration - Possible Duplicates search logic

So @Pedro raised an interesting Bugzilla administration question regards the implementation of Possible Duplicates. Ref fdo#63109 c2 and fdo#44462 I would have expected the summary

[Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

* Present + Andras, Joel, Bjoern, Stephan, David, Astron, Thorsten, Michael M, Caolan, Eike, Cedric, Kendy, Petr * Completed Action Items + poke website guys wrt. feedback menu-item / page (Michael) + switch ESC time to CET to avoid changes (Michael) + Bug

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Hi, On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 04:58:35PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > + instead have the global headers in one central global directory > + write up for the mailing list (Bjoern) done > AI: + mail list of committers to ESC (Bjoern) done > + Java tests written at Su

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla administration info - Help for

Today I added full syntax BSA Help to the Wiki on . Works fine from there (for example: selects correct Component Version in picker), should also work from BSA after an update there and fix the not working "Read more

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New Bugzilla Version warning

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 12:27 PM, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: > ]] Rainer Bielefeld > > > I see that the "Change to later Version Warning" Enhancement is under > > construction - great! > > It's actually there. Now it even just displays when the list index > increases (that is, we assume the versions

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New Bugzilla Version warning

]] Rainer Bielefeld > I see that the "Change to later Version Warning" Enhancement is under > construction - great! It's actually there. Now it even just displays when the list index increases (that is, we assume the versions are sorted with the lowest on top). This seems to be true atm, at le

[Libreoffice-qa] [LibreOffice-QA] Conference Call - April 10th @ 1800 GMT

Hi All, Our regularly scheduled public Friday meeting has been moved this week to next Wednesday @ 1800 GMT/UTC. Meeting: Date: April 10th, 2013 Time: 1800 UTC/GMT Agenda (still preparing, feel free to append): https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/April_10 Any questions can be d

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla administration info - Help for

Hi Rainer, I added "links" to bugzilla from the German QA-Wiki (see [1]). Is it okay? [1] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport_Details#Database regards Jochen Am 04.04.2013 20:04, schrieb Rainer Bielefeld: Today I added full syntax BSA Help to the Wiki on

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New Bugzilla Version warning

Tollef Fog Heen schrieb: It's actually there. Now it even just displays when the list index increases (that is, we assume the versions are sorted with the lowest on top). This seems to be true atm, at least. Hi Tollef, thank you for feedback. Unfortunately it seems some more sophisticated.

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New Bugzilla Version warning

Rainer Bielefeld schrieb: but currently I can't remember where. I will do some tests tomorrow. Hm, Browser cache or whatever else? Currently I indeed only see that Master old 3.6 special case where we get a wrong alarm. CU Rainer ___ List Name:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla administration info - Help for

On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Jochen wrote: > Hi Rainer, > > I added "links" to bugzilla from the German QA-Wiki (see [1]). Is it okay? > > [1] https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/BugReport_Details#Database Updated URL: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BSA/BugReport_Details#Database (we

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] New Bugzilla Version warning

]] Rainer Bielefeld > thank you for feedback. Unfortunately it seems some more > sophisticated. Very most changes are indicated correctly, but for > example take , > what is for 4.0.1.2. Change to Master Old 3.6 (before 4.0.1.2), > message will