Can someone check this out, confirm prioritize it - been sitting
unconfirmed for way too longer. I checked it out but am unsure how to
confirm it without similar distro. Thanks in advance, trying to tackle
these older unconfirmed bugs against version 4+.
Hi,
please note that the commit deadline for 4.0.3.1, aka rc1, is on today,
April 15, 2013.
The tag and branch libreoffice-4-0-3 is going to be created tomorrow.
Only commits with 3 reviewers will be allowed for that branch.
See also
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan#4.0_release
On Sun, 2013-04-14 at 22:18 -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
Can someone check this out, confirm prioritize it - been sitting
unconfirmed for way too longer. I checked it out but am unsure how to
confirm it without similar distro. Thanks in advance, trying to tackle
these older unconfirmed bugs
Any new strings?
Thanks, m.
2013/4/15 Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz
Hi,
please note that the commit deadline for 4.0.3.1, aka rc1, is on today,
April 15, 2013.
The tag and branch libreoffice-4-0-3 is going to be created tomorrow.
Only commits with 3 reviewers will be allowed for that
Robinson Tryon píše v Pá 12. 04. 2013 v 13:24 -0400:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
Regarding the EOL date, I've mocked-up an example of how we could
display it on the wiki page:
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 08:18:17PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
We select 10-15 possible enhancements that can be completed in a
reasonably short period of time (within a minor release). We blog
about this (I can do this) with a simple poll. We then announce this
to the user list and make
Hi qubit (do you prefer Robinson?) and joel
jmadero wrote
Together, I think that we can improve both the Ask site and QA, and
make the LibreOffice support system a less scary and more responsive
experience for our users.
I completely agree with this - perhaps some basic tutorials are in
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 5:53 AM, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
Robinson Tryon píše v Pá 12. 04. 2013 v 13:24 -0400:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:00 AM, Petr Mladek pmla...@suse.cz wrote:
Regarding the EOL date, I've mocked-up an example of how we could
display it on the wiki page:
Hi,
This is my first mail sent to the 'libreoffice-qa' mail-list.
I hope this is the correct method of doing things...
My question is:
What is the difference between bugs posted under 'Writer' section with the
keyword 'FILEOPEN', to bugs in the 'filter and storage' section?
To me - it seems as if
I agree that both Ask and QA need more people and need to be more user
friendly. In addition I think there are questions beings asked and answered
(in short duplicated) because there are too many channels (mail, forum,
ask)
but too little people. I don't have any idea how to improve this...
Hi All,
Our regularly scheduled conference call is happening this Friday at 1300
GMT, feel free to join and listen in, give your input on our QA processes,
etc
Call: Friday, April 19th, 2013
Time: 1300 GMT
Agenda: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/April_19
Looks like
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michael...@canonical.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 08:18:17PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
We select 10-15 possible enhancements that can be completed in a
reasonably short period of time (within a minor release). We blog
Also we don't need a new system for the voting, we already have the
bugzilla.
Currently we don't use bugzilla voting, also it is a big problem if the #1
enhancement request is some crazy request that takes 1000 hours to
implement. The idea is that we limit the poll to enhancements we KNOW can
Hi All,
I think this is a completely manageable goal and will help ensure the next
minor release of 4 is free of blockers.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Kieran Peckett crazyske...@gmail.comwrote:
On XP here - is there a search to limit bugs to XP only?
Unfortunately, no. What we can do is when we hit a bug that says bug
present on XP, we can CC you on it if that's okay?
This list is at least down to Windows
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Kieran Peckett crazyske...@gmail.com
wrote:
On XP here - is there a search to limit bugs to XP only?
+1
Unfortunately, no. What we can do is when we hit a bug that says bug present
These ones are just kind of sitting around, we need someone who has
experience with webdav to take a look at them, thanks in advance!
Instead of just cc'ing one guy, is there a way to tag the bug as
Windows XP ? that would then mean that anyone interested in XP bugs
(not just Kieran) could see that list.
I think we should discuss a broader solution on Friday - one idea is
whiteboard status OS-XP OS-7 OS-8 if the bug is
Hi Kieran
Kieran Peckett wrote
On XP here - is there a search to limit bugs to XP only?
Are you crazyskeggy in Bugzilla?
I reopened Bug #62089 because I can replicate the bug if I replicate the
submitter's conditions i.e. switch to Windows Classis style under Windows
XP.
Cheers,
Pedro
--
I am just filling out a bug and realize the LibreOfficeBox is not in the
list. Should it not be included?
Cheers,
Marc
--
Marc Paré
m...@marcpare.com
http://www.parEntreprise.com
parEntreprise.com Supports OpenDocument Formats (ODF)
parEntreprise.com Supports http://www.LibreOffice.org
Le 15/04/13 12:20 PM, Joel Madero a écrit :
Totally understood, when the forum goes live it will add another layer
to the puzzle (although my understanding is this *might* replace ask at
some point.
Just to make this clear, the forums is not going to replace Ask, Ask
replaced the need for a
21 matches
Mail list logo
