Hi ape
I believe it must be related to the fact that many of the tinderboxes (e.g.
Tinderbox #6, the only one producing binaries for all Windows versions) were
run by Suse staff and Suse has dropped LO development
(https://people.gnome.org/~michael/blog/2013-09-03-collabora.html)
See list of tind
Hi Pedro,
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Pedro wrote:
> I believe it must be related to the fact that many of the tinderboxes (e.g.
> Tinderbox #6, the only one producing binaries for all Windows versions) were
> run by Suse staff and Suse has dropped LO development
> (https://people.gnome.org
Hi Andras
Andras Timar-3 wrote
> No, that's not the case. Tinderboxes are up and running and it was
> never the responsibility of the SUSE staff to fix regressions reported
> by Tinderboxes.
I never said (or implied) it was their responsibility to fix those
regressions :)
I assumed that the Ti
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:34 PM, Pedro wrote:
> Tinderbox #39 manages to produce Windows binaries most days (even if they do
> not work in Windows XP) so it must be doing something right :)
Yes, because it builds with --disable-odk.
Regards,
Andras
___
