Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Running LO 4.3 alpha in Windows XP...

2014-05-05 Thread Manfred J. Krause
Hi all, On Mon, May 5, 2014 at 12:42 AM, Pedro wrote: Hi all I can't do anything with LO 4.3 alpha under Windows XP Pro x86 en_US SP3: 1) create new doc, type one word, crash 2) create new spreadsheet, type anything, crash 3) create new presentation, crash 4) create new drawing, crash

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [documentliberation-discuss] ODF compatibility tests

2014-05-05 Thread Michael Stahl
On 02/05/14 15:01, Charles-H. Schulz wrote: Jay, Replying in more details: there are a few ODF validators out there but they are neither autoritative nor maintained. And ODF 1,2 has evolved after they were released: http://plugfest.opendocsociety.org/doku.php?id=validators:overview at

[Libreoffice-qa] Question of the use of 'Fresh' rather than 'Beta' and support for XP

2014-05-05 Thread Jay Philips
Hi All, I was curious why the word Fresh is used rather than the more widely used word Beta for the latest development release branch. This was a confusing thing to me as well until I read Fresh, targeted to early adopters and technology enthusiasts, and Stable targeted to enterprise

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question of the use of 'Fresh' rather than 'Beta' and support for XP

2014-05-05 Thread Michael Meeks
Hi Jay, On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 14:13 +0400, Jay Philips wrote: I was curious why the word Fresh is used rather than the more widely used word Beta for the latest development release branch. I think you're confused by the naming. Currently we have these releases: 4.3 (master) -

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question of the use of 'Fresh' rather than 'Beta' and support for XP

2014-05-05 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 02:13:04PM +0400, Jay Philips wrote: I was curious why the word Fresh is used rather than the more widely used word Beta for the latest development release branch. Beta is rarely used for branches, it is mostly used for tags (just like LibreOffice does). Best, Bjoern

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question of the use of 'Fresh' rather than 'Beta' and support for XP

2014-05-05 Thread Jay Philips
Hi Michael, On 05/05/2014 02:37 PM, Michael Meeks wrote: Hi Jay, I think you're confused by the naming. Currently we have these releases: 4.3 (master) - Beta 4.2 - Fresh 4.1 - Stable As/when we release 4.3.0 those will rotate I imagine: master

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] No thinderbox build for Windows master after 30-04-14

2014-05-05 Thread V Stuart Foote
Markus, While the TB's are back on line. Look to have a lingering issue with the builds where now toolbar action (Tools - Options for example) has lost its resulting actions and the UI simply hangs with a partial GUI dialog opening. Reported in BZ as fdo#78266

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question of the use of 'Fresh' rather than 'Beta' and support for XP

2014-05-05 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi, On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:59:37PM +0400, Jay Philips wrote: Yes initially i was confused as i was used to seeing chrome's labelling there releases as development, beta and stable.I think it would be great if the website would provide better explanation on the download pages of what each

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question of the use of 'Fresh' rather than 'Beta' and support for XP

2014-05-05 Thread Sophie
Hi, Le 05/05/2014 15:36, Bjoern Michaelsen a écrit : Hi, On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:59:37PM +0400, Jay Philips wrote: Yes initially i was confused as i was used to seeing chrome's labelling there releases as development, beta and stable.I think it would be great if the website would provide

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question of the use of 'Fresh' rather than 'Beta' and support for XP

2014-05-05 Thread Jay Philips
Hello, On 05/05/2014 05:36 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: Hi, On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:59:37PM +0400, Jay Philips wrote: Yes initially i was confused as i was used to seeing chrome's labelling there releases as development, beta and stable.I think it would be great if the website would

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Question of the use of 'Fresh' rather than 'Beta' and support for XP

2014-05-05 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi, On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 07:24:07PM +0400, Jay Philips wrote: Please enlighten me as i couldnt find any mention of submitting bug reports on the download page. Hint: libreoffice.org is the download page. Calling for bug reports is on that page, along with all the other essential stuff. But

[Libreoffice-qa] REMINDER: QA Call today at 18:30 UTC

2014-05-05 Thread Robinson Tryon
For meeting information, a handy-dandy url that will convert the meeting time into your local time zone, and more, see the wiki page here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2014/May_05 I hope to see all of you there! Best, --R -- Robinson Tryon LibreOffice Community Outreach

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] DOCX Test 4 Results

2014-05-05 Thread Joel Madero
On future reports will you try to include your computer specs (most importantly your OS) :) Best, Joel On 05/05/2014 01:03 AM, Jay Philips wrote: Hi Joel, Its been done. :) Jay Philips On 05/05/2014 02:48 AM, Joel Madero wrote: Ah - okay new plan. CC me on every regression and put

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Something wrong with LibreOfficeDev_4.3.0.0.alpha1_Win_x86

2014-05-05 Thread m.a.riosv
Hi Stuart, thanks for the quick answer. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Something-wrong-with-LibreOfficeDev-4-3-0-0-alpha1-Win-x86-tp4107600p4107621.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

[Libreoffice-qa] Something wrong with LibreOfficeDev_4.3.0.0.alpha1_Win_x86

2014-05-05 Thread m.a.riosv
Hi all, beside the recent thread of Pedro Running LO 4.3 alpha in Windows XP..., I have just reported a crash bug in Menu/Tools/Options/Language settings https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78266, where I comment it's no possible to access the Menu/Tools/Options with

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] DOCX Test 4 Results

2014-05-05 Thread Jay Philips
Hi Joel, Yes someone else suggested that as well which i will be doing. Any particular specs your looking for? Jay Philips On 05/05/2014 08:56 PM, Joel Madero wrote: On future reports will you try to include your computer specs (most importantly your OS) :) Best, Joel On 05/05/2014

[Libreoffice-qa] Redmine Website QA Suggestions

2014-05-05 Thread Joel Madero
Hi All, Per our discussion, here is a single thread where I think we should discuss suggestions to make the website clearer and then one of us (I'll volunteer if no one else does...) can go to redmine to offer the suggestion. This way we aren't offering contradictory suggestions. So the first

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LIbreOffice 4.2.4 RC2 available

2014-05-05 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Dear Community, The Document Foundation is pleased to announce the second release candidate of LibreOffice 4.2.4. The upcoming 4.2.4 will be the fourth in a sequence of frequent bugfix releases for our feature-packed 4.2 line. Feel free to give it a try instead of 4.2.3. Conservative users should

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Redmine Website QA Suggestions

2014-05-05 Thread Bjoern Michaelsen
Hi, On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 02:16:15PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote: So the first question is for the default download page - are we generally agreed that stable should be the default? Im disagreeing there. The only reason stable is more settled than fresh is that we have so many people

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Something wrong with LibreOfficeDev_4.3.0.0.alpha1_Win_x86

2014-05-05 Thread V Stuart Foote
Tested on Windows 7 sp1, 64-bit en-US with Version: 4.3.0.0.alpha1+ Build ID: d09d75167d77adcc8538c5cc5d8fe6bac6091ca1 TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2014-05-05_23:04:20 All seems to be corrected now. -- View this message in context:

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Running LO 4.3 alpha in Windows XP...

2014-05-05 Thread V Stuart Foote
Pedro, *, Pre-release Windows build of Version: 4.3.0.0.alpha1 Build ID: 46cfcd5a05aa1d13fecd73f5a25b64b8d8dd6781 Was definitely broken as in https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77891 http://fdo#77891 , not sure of the exact reason, but it is NOT isolated to Windows XP. Also, prior and