Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibO 3.5.0 beta1 WIN7 64bit

2011-12-13 Thread klaus-jürgen weghorn ol
Am 13.12.2011 23:42, schrieb klaus-jürgen weghorn ol: Hi all, after downloading Libo-dev-3.5.0beta1_install_multi.msi today in the evening I installed it in WIN7 64bit in parallel to 3.4.4. But looking in C:\Program Files (x86)\LOdev 3.5\program there were neither exes nor dlls. Even all other fo

[Libreoffice-qa] Bug 43808 - (rtl-meta) Meta bug for RTL related issues

2011-12-13 Thread Rainer Bielefeld
Hi Lior, We have quite a lot of RTL indicators: and most people use RTL in Summary line and now a new task bug and on I learned an additional meaning ;-) Common sense se

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] QA ideas for 3.5 WAS Re: [Libreoffice] Improving the QA and Release for 3.5

2011-12-13 Thread Yifan Jiang
Hi Cor, I hope I didn't interrupt anything :) But here's some of my comments. 1. Thanks for Rimas and Petr's actively participating, what we did in the past two month to improve the structure of Litmus and now the new stuff is online and a 3.5.0 beta regression test run is created, in which we ar

[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.0 Beta1 test builds available

2011-12-13 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi *, for 3.5.0 beta1, we're now uploading preliminary builds to a public (but non-mirrored - so don't spread news too widely!) place, as soon as they're available. Grab them here: http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/ If you've a bit of time, please give them a try & report *critical*

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] LibO 3.5.0 beta1 WIN7 64bit

2011-12-13 Thread Thorsten Behrens
klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote: > after downloading Libo-dev-3.5.0beta1_install_multi.msi today in the > evening I installed it in WIN7 64bit in parallel to 3.4.4. But > looking in > C:\Program Files (x86)\LOdev 3.5\program there were neither exes nor dlls. > Even all other folders were empty. The o

[Libreoffice-qa] LibO 3.5.0 beta1 WIN7 64bit

2011-12-13 Thread klaus-jürgen weghorn ol
Hi all, after downloading Libo-dev-3.5.0beta1_install_multi.msi today in the evening I installed it in WIN7 64bit in parallel to 3.4.4. But looking in C:\Program Files (x86)\LOdev 3.5\program there were neither exes nor dlls. Even all other folders were empty. The only full folder was the help

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] QA ideas for 3.5 WAS Re: [Libreoffice] Improving the QA and Release for 3.5

2011-12-13 Thread Cor Nouws
Hi Petr, Cor Nouws wrote (09-12-11 13:44) On the wiki, I added a section with the draft for the later to create separate wiki page: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Improving_QA-Release-3.5#DRAFT_for_page_with_info_for_bug-hunting_session Is it possible for you - without wanting to stres

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Which nightly/daily build should be used?

2011-12-13 Thread Pedro Lino
Hi Petr >> I repeat my previous question: Is it important for testing purposes >> how many/which repositories are used? > > I think that it does not mater. Every build has advantages and > disadvantages. Thank you for the detailed answer. I will stick to the newly uploaded Beta1 for the moment un

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] End of the line for 3.3 family and regressions

2011-12-13 Thread Petr Mladek
Rainer Bielefeld píše v So 10. 12. 2011 v 12:59 +0100: > Pedro Lino schrieb: > > > Looking at the Release Plan chart > > Pedro Lino schrieb: > > Hi, > > I am just preparing some information concerning such regression problems > we will discuss during next TSC call on Thursday before I publish

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Which nightly/daily build should be used?

2011-12-13 Thread Petr Mladek
Hi Pedro, I think that you can't do a mistake. Any the suggested builds were good for testing. Pedro Lino píše v Ne 11. 12. 2011 v 23:28 +: > The problem arises again: > > For Beta0 testing Petr Mladek suggests getting the latest from > http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/Win-x86@6-fast/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Java 7 support in LO 3.4.5 (was: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ...)

2011-12-13 Thread Pedro Lino
>> Executed File, Wizard, Letter. LOdev crashed. > >        Gosh; when you say 'crashed' - it took down the whole office suite ? > that is a pretty horrendous existing bug it'd be nice to fix. Yep. I would say so :) >> Conclusion >> LO 3.4.4 works like a charm but won't detect Java 7; > >        

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [ANNOUNCE] libreoffice-3.4.99.1 tag created (3.5.0-beta1)

2011-12-13 Thread Petr Mladek
Petr Mladek píše v Po 12. 12. 2011 v 18:34 +0100: > Hi, > > there have been created the libreoffice-3.4.99.1 tag for 3.5.0-beta1 release. > The corresponding official builds will be available within 4 days or so. I am sorry. I created the source tarballs from a wrong directory (beta0 was made fro

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Java 7 support in LO 3.4.5 (was: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ...)

2011-12-13 Thread Michael Meeks
On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 19:53 +, Pedro Lino wrote: > Uninstalled Java 6 rev 29. > Run LO 3.4.4. Executed File, Wizard, Letter. Reported missing Java > Run LOdev 3.5.0 Build ID: f923851-7f15fca-1f1fd1a-ca8e46d-5bcbce4. > Executed File, Wizard, Letter. LOdev crashed. Gosh; when you say 'c

[Libreoffice-qa] Crash in Impress in slideshow mode with linked movie ?

2011-12-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Hi, it seems that Impress in LO 3.5.0 crashes under *MS-Windows* in slideshow mode when you try to show a slide with a linked movie (menu Insert -> Movie and Sound...). No problem for me under Ubuntu. Can you confirm ? Sorry, no time today to check bugzilla. Best regards. JBF -- Seuls des form