[Libreoffice-qa] Crash in Impress in slideshow mode with linked movie ?

2011-12-13 Thread Jean-Baptiste Faure
Hi,

it seems that Impress in LO 3.5.0 crashes under *MS-Windows* in
slideshow mode when you try to show a slide with a linked movie (menu
Insert - Movie and Sound...).

No problem for me under Ubuntu.

Can you confirm ? Sorry, no time today to check bugzilla.

Best regards.
JBF
-- 
Seuls des formats ouverts peuvent assurer la pérennité de vos documents.
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Java 7 support in LO 3.4.5 (was: [Libreoffice] minutes of tech. steering call ...)

2011-12-13 Thread Michael Meeks

On Mon, 2011-12-12 at 19:53 +, Pedro Lino wrote:
 Uninstalled Java 6 rev 29.
 Run LO 3.4.4. Executed File, Wizard, Letter. Reported missing Java
 Run LOdev 3.5.0 Build ID: f923851-7f15fca-1f1fd1a-ca8e46d-5bcbce4.
 Executed File, Wizard, Letter. LOdev crashed.

Gosh; when you say 'crashed' - it took down the whole office suite ?
that is a pretty horrendous existing bug it'd be nice to fix.

 Conclusion
 LO 3.4.4 works like a charm but won't detect Java 7;

Right there is no support there.

 LO 3.5.0 crashes on Wizard execution if Java is not installed or was
 not detected. Works as expected when Java is detected or selected.

So - on this basis, it sounds like supporting Java 7 is something we
should be doing, if only to avoid the crashes when it is not present ;-)
Having said that - the relevant components will be disabled if there was
no Java on the system at install time.

 One question: if both Java versions are installed and I do not specify
 which one to use, which version is used?

You can select it in tools-options IIRC, otherwise the latest version.

Thanks so much for testing,

ATB,

Michael.

-- 
michael.me...@suse.com  , Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/


[Libreoffice-qa] [ANN] LibreOffice 3.5.0 Beta1 test builds available

2011-12-13 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi *,

for 3.5.0 beta1, we're now uploading preliminary builds to a public
(but non-mirrored - so don't spread news too widely!) place, as soon
as they're available. Grab them here:

http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/pre-releases/

If you've a bit of time, please give them a try  report *critical*
bugs not yet in bugzilla here, so we can incorporate them into the
release notes, and/or roll new builds. Please note that it takes
approximately 24 hours to populate the mirrors, so that's about the
time we have to collect feedback.

Except for 

 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43455

all other Windows-specific bugs listed on

 http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Releases/3.5.0/Beta0

should be fixed.

Thanks a lot for your help,

-- Thorsten


pgpQaV1r4ktLc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

Re: [Libreoffice-qa] QA ideas for 3.5 WAS Re: [Libreoffice] Improving the QA and Release for 3.5

2011-12-13 Thread Yifan Jiang
Hi Cor,

I hope I didn't interrupt anything :) But here's some of my comments.

1. Thanks for Rimas and Petr's actively participating, what we did in the past
two month to improve the structure of Litmus and now the new stuff is online
and a 3.5.0 beta regression test run is created, in which we are encouraging
people to run the tests.

https://tcm.documentfoundation.org/

There are a few important changes need to notify people, especially for l10n
testers that:

- we now have the localization test cases merged together with English
cases, both in content and structure. Then we add locale-dependent
property for each test case.

 https://tcm.documentfoundation.org/show_test.cgi?id=3105

Specifically, a test result submitted for a locale dependent cases will
not influence the progress statistics of the test cases running in another
locale condition. For a locale independent case,the executing result will
be shared among all tests whatever locales were seleted. For locale
selection I meant the bottom field here in test configuration details set:

 http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Litmus_chose-de.png

So it is important to make people informed correct locale selection is
necessary before submitting test results.

Also it is important to let l10n people know the translation version of
test cases are not disappeared, all languages versions of test cases were
just put together to save our effort depend on how much they related with
languages.

- we abandoned the build id selection to avoid duplicating test effort. So
it is important to make people informed to actively use correct build
submitting a result in the corresponding test run. For build id selection
I also meant the field in configuration details set (the screenshot needs
to update for this...):

 http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Litmus_chose-de.png

- we grouped test cases with priorities, and it is preferred the higher
priority test cases are executed before lower ones. This can be seen
when it comes to test group selection after the above configuration set.

2. We also got the wiki page updated and cleaned up. The important start pages
to understand all related stuff can be:

http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Litmus
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Testing/Regression_Tests

3. As for the regression test plan, we got a full regression test related
section in the QA processes page typically to describe what a Litmus admin
should do when there comes a build:


http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Processes#Full_regression_test_management

Briefly speaking, we create a single test run for every beta and rc phases,
during whose time slot the test cases inside test runs are supposed to be
executed.

For example, from the release plan, we will have 3 beta builds from 5/Dec to
9/Jan. In this phase, we do NOT create three test runs, instead the only test
run 3.5.0 beta regression test will be recommended there for nearly a month,
when continuously submitting test result in the latest 3.5 beta build is
expected.

4. Is it possible to emphasize the regression strategy in the bug hunting
session you are planning? :)

Not sure if some of the points answered your original question :) Please let
me know if anyone needs more regression test and litmus related information!
Thank you!

Best wishes,
Yifan

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:35:44PM +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
 Hi Petr,
 
 Cor Nouws wrote (09-12-11 13:44)
 
 On the wiki, I added a section with the draft for the later to create
 separate wiki page:
 http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Improving_QA-Release-3.5#DRAFT_for_page_with_info_for_bug-hunting_session
 
 Is it possible for you - without wanting to stress you - to tell
 smthg more about the expected planning?
 
 tjanks a lot
 
 
___
List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org
Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/