Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla down?
Hi! Still down! Florian Reisinger (Von meinem iPad gesendet / Sent via iPad) Am 10.09.2012 um 20:09 schrieb Rainer Bielefeld : > Hi, > > Bugzilla seems to be down? > > CU > > Rainer > ___ > List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list > Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org > Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa > Problems? > http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Test file for Conditional Formatting.
Yi Fan Jiang schrieb: Hi Miguel, It looks great! I think it is valuable to take the test case to our regression test base Moztrap, HI, yes, of course, it's important to increase intensity of pre-release routine checks. Best regards Rainer ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Test file for Conditional Formatting.
Hi Miguel, It looks great! I think it is valuable to take the test case to our regression test base Moztrap, so we will at least have the conditional format checked in each major release testing. https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Moztrap To help other people how to test the document, do you have some testing steps describing exactly what to do step by step (instructions), and what are the expected result of each step (verify points)? Here is a sample how would a test case in Moztrap looks like: ---><--- Test that conditional format [Optional] put some detailed description here. When in English = * instruction 1 (vp.1) * instruction 2 * instruction 3 (vp.2) Then in English = 1. verify point 1 2. verify point 2 ---><--- Please notice with one test sample, you could write down different test cases for different testing purpose. For example, one test case for basic function of Conditional formatting, another test case specifically designed for backward compatibility testing... To populate the test case, you could simply send a mail here (I would help to add them to Moztrap) or register to Moztrap to do it yourself (with permission assigned). Please do not hesitate to let me know if you have problems to do it :) Best wishes, Yifan >>> mariosv 09/11/12 6:00 AM >>> Hi, relating with the new design of conditional formatting, in my opinion it is necessary to check the proper functioning of it, especially to avoid compatibility problems with versions of LibreOffice not including the new design (up to 3.5) After a short exchange of views with Marcus, I have made a first test file, made in 3.5.5.3, contains the different types of conditional formatting in classic design, to check if opened successfully in the new versions, and if saved correctly to open with previous versions. Licensed under MPL/LGPLv3 +, as required in the wiki. I have begun a new test for the new design, but I have found several issues what I have reported, which seems to me, make difficult by now obtain a practical test. Regards. Miguel Ángel. http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n4006658/LibreO_qaTest_ConditionalFormatting_3-5-5-3_en.ods LibreO_qaTest_ConditionalFormatting_3-5-5-3_en.ods -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Test-file-for-Conditional-Formatting-tp4006658.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] Test file for Conditional Formatting.
Hi, relating with the new design of conditional formatting, in my opinion it is necessary to check the proper functioning of it, especially to avoid compatibility problems with versions of LibreOffice not including the new design (up to 3.5) After a short exchange of views with Marcus, I have made a first test file, made in 3.5.5.3, contains the different types of conditional formatting in classic design, to check if opened successfully in the new versions, and if saved correctly to open with previous versions. Licensed under MPL/LGPLv3 +, as required in the wiki. I have begun a new test for the new design, but I have found several issues what I have reported, which seems to me, make difficult by now obtain a practical test. Regards. Miguel Ángel. http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/file/n4006658/LibreO_qaTest_ConditionalFormatting_3-5-5-3_en.ods LibreO_qaTest_ConditionalFormatting_3-5-5-3_en.ods -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Test-file-for-Conditional-Formatting-tp4006658.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] Bugzilla down?
Hi, Bugzilla seems to be down? CU Rainer ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] Triaging Project Update (10/09/2012)
Weekly update and reminder that we're still looking for people to help out. Progress is ongoing but it's slowed down a bit. Thanks to everyone continuing to help. Here is the link to the spreadsheet again: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0ApS-XtOUGGH5dDIwaXN1YnNsM0h4RXFKdVhvb2RRb0E#gid=1 Stats, I've updated format, this is how it will look for now on for weekly updates: Date/# > 30 Days/Average Days Since Open/Average Days Since Last Change/Median Days Since Open/Median Days Since Last Change 4/9/2012 893 100 64 87 52 10/9/2012 845 103 65 86 50 Formatting is terrible in gmail, tables don't seem to work right. Hope everyone had a great weekend, happy Monday Joel ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 04:42:11PM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote: > * QA update (Rainer) > + HardHacks: > ID OS Component - Summary > > 32948 Linux Libreoffice/Database(?) - Address Book Data Source >Wizard fails with message "No SDBC driver was found" > + bug-log mixes several different issues, very unclear. > + please open separate, new, clean issues & re-report. > + one is split to bug#54450 Evo/Addressbook doesn't work > + David to kindly look into it. David fixed the issue, which was specific to "evolution address book, but none of gnome-vfs, nor gconf, nor gio are enabled". > AI: + enable evolution connector in distro-config for Linux > (Lionel) AI done (on master only, for 3.7) http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=b410acd1369609107eb3d99db767d7e779c393ce -- Lionel ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Closing bugs in bugzilla: fixed in master or fixed everywhere?
On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 09:24:41PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote: > On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 06:30:30PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: >> So if you go to https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37361 (LO >> 3.5 MAB), you have to click through on *each* resolved bug to read the >> bug log and try to see if there is a "fixed in 3.5.x" comment (or >> possibly look in whiteboard for a target:3.5", so that you can >> evaluate whether it is still relevant, or if action is needed? >> This makes it IMHO too easy for a bug to "slip under the radar" and be >> forgotten. > Why not just query for target 3.5.x in whiteboard? Yeah, a query would work, you make me realise that. However, just going to the webpage and seeing how much in the "Depends on" area is crossed out and how much is not is more immediate, IMHO. (Yes, it make give too much, because that bug is fixed in that branch and waiting for action on another branch, but I prefer to err on the side of overevaluation instead of underevaluation). So, different people have given arguments in both directions. IMHO, the advantages of doing it (one way or the other) consistently outweigh the advantages of either direction; thus I'd like us to be consistent as a community on this question. So how do we go from here to establish a community standard? -- Lionel ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
