Bjoern Michaelsen wrote (07-01-13 19:36)
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:12:38PM +0100, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
the QA talk at FOSDEm still needs a volunteer. It would be great if
one of you would be able to give this presentation. It will be on
Sunday morning in the Libreoffice dev-room.
I really c
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:12:38PM +0100, Markus Mohrhard wrote:
> the QA talk at FOSDEm still needs a volunteer. It would be great if
> one of you would be able to give this presentation. It will be on
> Sunday morning in the Libreoffice dev-room.
I really cant make it to FOSDEM this year, so som
Hey guys,
the QA talk at FOSDEm still needs a volunteer. It would be great if
one of you would be able to give this presentation. It will be on
Sunday morning in the Libreoffice dev-room.
Please consult https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/Events/Fosdem2013
for more information. The talk
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 17:16 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
> * 4.0 pending tasks
> + MSI file re-name to be renamed for 4.0 LibreOffice
> + also rename the Linux download tar-balls (Fridrich)
> + and Mac packages.
> + causes some pain for download script
Pedro schrieb:
Hi Pedro,
I believe currently it is not a big difference whether you test Branch
4.0 or Master 4.1. The very most bugs you find in 4.1 will also be in
4.0, and any fix will be done in Master first.
Nevertheless, I recommend to focus un 4.0 branch, especially intensive
working
Hi all
In theory running the latest master build should be the correct option for
someone doing QA.
Since fixes are added to master and then "cherry-picked" to the branches any
fixes added to master should be included in the branches (or so I
understand...)
However the updated information in the
