Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Volunteer for QA talk at FOSDEM needed
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote (07-01-13 19:36) On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:12:38PM +0100, Markus Mohrhard wrote: the QA talk at FOSDEm still needs a volunteer. It would be great if one of you would be able to give this presentation. It will be on Sunday morning in the Libreoffice dev-room. I really cant make it to FOSDEM this year, so somebody else needs to step in. And Markus is right: FOSDEM is quite cool! Bjoern is right - so pls come all :-) Oh, by the way: probably I will too. However, am not so on track with all recent QA improvements and have close to zero spare time this month. So if someone else has the opportunity to do it, or to do it with me in cooperation, that would definitely be the better choice :-) Cheers, -- - Cor - http://nl.libreoffice.org - www.librelex.org ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Volunteer for QA talk at FOSDEM needed
On Mon, Jan 07, 2013 at 07:12:38PM +0100, Markus Mohrhard wrote: > the QA talk at FOSDEm still needs a volunteer. It would be great if > one of you would be able to give this presentation. It will be on > Sunday morning in the Libreoffice dev-room. I really cant make it to FOSDEM this year, so somebody else needs to step in. And Markus is right: FOSDEM is quite cool! Best, Bjoern ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] Volunteer for QA talk at FOSDEM needed
Hey guys, the QA talk at FOSDEm still needs a volunteer. It would be great if one of you would be able to give this presentation. It will be on Sunday morning in the Libreoffice dev-room. Please consult https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/Events/Fosdem2013 for more information. The talk is also listed there without a speaker for now and we have to add the schedule to the FOSDEM system soon. It is one of the coolest conference to present other people the great work the QA team is doing and how much fun it is to participate. Regards, Markus ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...
On Thu, 2012-12-13 at 17:16 +, Michael Meeks wrote: > * 4.0 pending tasks > + MSI file re-name to be renamed for 4.0 LibreOffice > + also rename the Linux download tar-balls (Fridrich) > + and Mac packages. > + causes some pain for download scripts (Thorsten) > + getting installer up on download list, other > shuffling is painful > + LibO not a great truncation - branding-wise. I have pushed this change to master and 4.0 branch: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=44cd995f02d2b46e5b0bfb3cbd743a366d4284f7 http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?h=libreoffice-4-0&id=6be476c04c48ff081f595b28e1eb51c94e382bb6 Note that I used "LibreOffice" only for the release builds. "LibO-Dev" is still used for daily builds and betas because I am not brave enough to break uploading daily builds at this stage. Well, it would be great to do it soon. Note that the fix for the tinderbox scripts is already pushed, see http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/contrib/buildbot/commit/?id=fd17b6be133056f618a32964f216c73cd7af1906 Best Regards, Petr ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Test master or latest branch?
Pedro schrieb: Hi Pedro, I believe currently it is not a big difference whether you test Branch 4.0 or Master 4.1. The very most bugs you find in 4.1 will also be in 4.0, and any fix will be done in Master first. Nevertheless, I recommend to focus un 4.0 branch, especially intensive working with the pre releases. Although it's not a big difference, the environment with the pre releases is some more realistic and more nearby to the versions normal users will use. Exception: Someone who is active en a muddled bug issue similar to that what we had with the new Calc Conditional Formatting design. In this case Master testing might be more effective because you will get the builds with fixes more early (less reviewing time). Best regards Rainer ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] Test master or latest branch?
Hi all In theory running the latest master build should be the correct option for someone doing QA. Since fixes are added to master and then "cherry-picked" to the branches any fixes added to master should be included in the branches (or so I understand...) However the updated information in the About box was added to the master (so it works on4.1) but can not be cherry picked to version 4.0 (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58034#c5) This makes me wonder: does it make sense to keep running Master builds or should QA focus on 4.0? Cheers, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Test-master-or-latest-branch-tp4027606.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
