On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:17:20AM -0500, Terrence Enger wrote:
On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 08:04 -0800, Joel Madero wrote:
Can someone triage this one? Thanks in advance!
And there has been quit a bit of subsequent discussion.
I wonder just what Lionel was proposing [1] after the announcement
On 01/21/2013 07:08 AM, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday, 2013-01-17 09:43:33 -0800, Joel Madero wrote:
-*Agreed: *NEEDINFO: Used only if most the information is there and
the bug can be confirmed but additional information would be useful
Request that once information is provided, move bug
On 01/21/2013 11:55 AM, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:17:20AM -0500, Terrence Enger wrote:
On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 08:04 -0800, Joel Madero wrote:
Can someone triage this one? Thanks in advance!
And there has been quit a bit of subsequent discussion.
I wonder just what
jmadero wrote
If you mark a bug as WFM, you are unable to go directly back to
UNCONFIRMED - which for me
is strange, I understand if it's marked as FIXED but WFM shouldn't block
you from doing UNCONFIRMED again.
Hi!
Are you sure about that? See this bug activity table:
Joel Madero schrieb:
-Status clarification (New vs. Reopened)
**Agreed: *Reopened should only be used if the bug is assigned
*Because of this agreement, modifications have to be made to our current
workflow
-*Agreed: *NEEDINFO: Used only if most the information
Hi all,
just stumbled upon
