Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Minutes of ESC call 2014-01-09
Jan Holesovsky-4 wrote > * Completed Action Items: > + test & document windows debug symbol server (QA guys?) > http://dev-downloads.libreoffice.org/symstore/symbols/ > [ Cloph uploading RC2 symbols, and also the source server! - so > sources will be available > in the debugger too ] Hi! This is great news, thanks a lot, hope to test it soon. Hope wiki article will be updated. Jan Holesovsky-4 wrote > > * Crashtest update (Markus) > + new crash-test / data: > + cf. http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/crashtest/ > + > http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/crashtest/2bb1a845a25ca9a39c96f37995453844461aed4e/ > + import crashes pretty good now > + export still not too good > + validation errors still high unfortunately How one can help with these? I have checked some bugs and their status is FIXED or an exported attachment is irrelevant to the bug itself. Should those crashers be marked somehow, bugs reopened or cloned into new reports, BTs added? Jan Holesovsky-4 wrote > > + many bugs are actually feature requests [...] > + 25% of NEW bugs are feature requests though -- which is good Anyone ever reviewed those enhancement requests (for instance UI changes)? I wonder if bugs marked as such (more than 1000) are any help for developers... Best regards. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Minutes-of-ESC-call-2014-01-09-tp4091475p4092217.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [SOLVED] Re: .odt to .pdf -- file extension question
Hi Markus, all Markus Mohrhard wrote > If it was changed it was surely not me but I remember some discussion > about > it either on the dev ML or in the ESC. See for example > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39168 In any case, if it does work that way under Linux but not under Windows then it requires a bug report. Can anyone confirm that saving a hybrid pdf under Linux (or Mac) using 4.2.0.2 creates a file with a double extension? Markus Mohrhard wrote >> IMO a double extension is a not such a good idea, although technically >> it >> might seem like a nice indicator... > > You are a bit late with this. The discussion happened a long time ago. Not really. Astron presented the same security and usability arguments I would use. If they were ignored then it's a TDF option. I do agree that hybrid PDFs are one of LO's hidden jewels. I just think that double extensions is not the way to highlight it (on the contrary, since antivirus will possibly start warning and blocking such files...) The best solution would be to create a new extension (possibly .hpdf as suggested by user Stephan Zietsman) and agree with PDF Reader makers to open these files as PDF by default and have a button to "Edit with..." (as suggested by Astron) IF Adobe would agree to this, then it would easily become a standard... Maybe TDF's Marketing and PR could make this happen??? In fact this format would be a great idea for Latex files (as mentioned by user SPM) and possibly others... Cheers, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-odt-to-pdf-file-extension-question-tp4091953p4092190.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] [SOLVED] Re: .odt to .pdf -- file extension question
Hey, On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:34 AM, Pedro wrote: > Hi Markus > > > Markus Mohrhard wrote > > No. I think we agreed to use od[stpg].pdf as extension during the export > > of > > hybrid pdf compared to pdf for normal pdf export. It just depends on > > whether you embed an odf document into the pdf or not. > > If you did that, then it's not working under Windows... > Deliberately saving as an hybrid pdf does not create a file with a double > extension. > If it was changed it was surely not me but I remember some discussion about it either on the dev ML or in the ESC. See for example https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39168 > > IMO a double extension is a not such a good idea, although technically it > might seem like a nice indicator... > You are a bit late with this. The discussion happened a long time ago. Regards, Markus ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
