Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Another Round of Interoperability
- Messaggio originale - Da: Jay Philips philip...@hotmail.com A: libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Inviato: Lunedì, 4 agosto 2014 22:05:07 Oggetto: Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Another Round of Interoperability Hi Marina, Hi Jay, All I have added all my recent non-fixed RTF bugs to the meta bug and will add my older list as well shortly. Thanks for confirming the bugs. :) Thank you :) Well done! Referring to fdo#82067 (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82067) I can confirm the problem but, according to http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sw/source/filter/ww8/writerhelper.hxx#75 this is a feature not our bug. We are anchoring all the images as character for compatibility reason because the anchor as character is the only one present in all MS rtf versions. I think this isn't the right behaviour but I'm not a dev and these are only my 2 cents. We could try to import the selected type of anchor specified in the document and use the as character one as a legacy mode. While creating a new rtf file we could try to use only the anchor as character, after informing the user of this kind of choice. Best, Marina -- Marina Latini mar...@studiostorti.com Studio Storti Srl Viale Leonardo da Vinci, 18 36100 - Vicenza (VI) http://www.studiostorti.com ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
[Libreoffice-qa] Someone with Kubuntu / KDE
Hi All, Stumbled on this Kubuntu UI bug in calc and wondered if someone can have a look at it. It may also effect other KDE desktops. https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82036 -- Regards, Jay Philips ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Someone with Kubuntu / KDE
I am running Debian/KDE I can check later today. OK? 2014-08-05 10:17 GMT+02:00 Jay Philips philip...@hotmail.com: Hi All, Stumbled on this Kubuntu UI bug in calc and wondered if someone can have a look at it. It may also effect other KDE desktops. https://www.libreoffice.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82036 -- Regards, Jay Philips ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/ -- Luc Castermans mailto:luc.casterm...@gmail.com ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Update whiteboard wiki page
Hello. Some weeks ago there was a discussion about whiteboard, but information in wiki is incomplete. For example, I can not find information about such statuses as filter:doc or filter:rtf. Indeed I see them missing ;) Good thing about wiki is that anyone can update it :-D The filter:xxx decision was made not too long ago - feel free to add it. Well, I have added information about filter:xxx and changed examples in BugTriage to use tags from the current list. Best regards, Alexandr ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Another Round of Interoperability
Thanks for the workflow info. Regarding the second case, are there more problems opening or saving the RTF documents. Can you send me some sample second and third case files for me to do some testing on? Regards, Jay Philips On 08/05/2014 02:41 PM, Marina Latini wrote: - Messaggio originale - Da: Jay Philips philip...@hotmail.com A: libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Inviato: Martedì, 5 agosto 2014 10:56:42 Oggetto: Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Another Round of Interoperability Hi Marina, About fdo#82067, i'm not a dev as well, but i think if the RTF opens in Word, Kingsoft Writer, and in the old RTF importer that libreoffice had in 3.3, then it should work now. Lets see what the devs think of it. :) ok :) You mentioned previously that Italy's Public Adminstrations uses rtf files for their workflow, is it just opening rtfs to convert them to odf or saving them also in rtf? the workflow is a little bit complicated. :( They use some third party softwares to generate the documents. These various softwares use rtf format as a template and through a mail merge produce the final rtf document with all the required fields. * First case: the software produces a doc file for editing and a pdf for storage. the users can edit the doc, send and store it. our doc filter works fine :) * Second case: the software produces a rtf file for editing and a pdf for storage. The user can edit the rtf and here we have a huge of interoperability problems. The versions of MS Office are heterogeneous and the final rtf files can be different. :( * Third case: the software uses a set of templates generated with MS Office. We have a lot of interoperability problems again :( * Fourth case: the software uses a set of handmade templates. We have interoperability problems but we can try to solve them ;) The biggest problems are related to the anchoring of the images and to tables or nested tables. In my speech in Bern I'll describe the Italian state of art. Best, Marina ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Another Round of Interoperability
Hello. Is useful expecially in Italy. Our Public Administrations use a lot of rtf files for their workflow and we have a lot of problem with this orrible file format. :( Often the bug report doesn't contain the whiteboard tag or the description is not so clear. so, a meta is useful for quickly identify and verify a new interoperability problem. Yes, I am meeting this problem too. Working with rtf in LibreOffice is painfull. If you believe that metabug helps developers - let it be. I add some old bugs. We should not foget about them. Best regards, Alexandr ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
Re: [Libreoffice-qa] Another Round of Interoperability
Hello. Is useful expecially in Italy. Our Public Administrations use a lot of rtf files for their workflow and we have a lot of problem with this orrible file format. :( Often the bug report doesn't contain the whiteboard tag or the description is not so clear. so, a meta is useful for quickly identify and verify a new interoperability problem. Yes, I am meeting this problem too. Working with rtf in LibreOffice is painfull. If you believe that metabug helps developers - let it be. I add some old bugs. We should not foget about them. Before opening a meta bug I suggest pinging the dev list (and particularly the rtf expert(s) and ask them if it will help at all. We have quite a few meta bugs that are literally never looked at. How would this be better than just putting filter:rtf on all of them? Would it do something extra? Best, Joel -- *Joel Madero* LibreOffice QA Volunteer jmadero@gmail.com ___ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
